enjoyed at any prince’s hands; we therefore, holding nothing dearer than our honour, and considering that no one thing could more touch our reputation than to induce so open and public a faction of a prince, and work a greater reproach than contempt at a subject’s hand, without reparation of our honour, have found it necessary to send you unto him, as well to charge him with the said contempt, as also to execute such other things as we think meet to be done, for the justifying of ourselves to the world, as the repairing of the indignity cast upon us by his undutiful manner of proceeding towards us . . . . .  And for that we find ourselves also not well dealt withal by the States, in that they have pressed the said Earl, without our assent or privity, to accept of a more absolute government than was agreed on between us and their commissioners, we have also thought meet that you shall charge them therewith, according to the directions hereafter ensuing.  And to the end there may be no delay used in the execution of that which we think meet to be presently done, you shall charge the said States, even as they tender the continuance of our good-will towards them, to proceed to the speedy execution of our request.”

After this trumpet-like preamble it may be supposed that the blast which followed would be piercing and shrill.  The instructions, in truth, consisted in wild, scornful flourishes upon one theme.  The word contempt had occurred five times in the brief preamble.  It was repeated in almost every line of the instructions.

“You shall let the Earl” (our cousin no longer) “understand,” said the Queen, “how highly and justly we are offended with his acceptation of the government, which we do repute to be a very great and strange contempt, least looked for at our hands, being, as he is, a creature of our own.”  His omission to acquaint her by letter with the causes moving him “so contemptuously to break” her commandment, his delay in sending Davison “to answer the said contempt,” had much “aggravated the fault,” although the Queen protested herself unable to imagine any “excuse for so manifest a contempt.”  The States were to be informed that she “held it strange” that “this creature of her own” should have been pressed by them to “commit so notorious a contempt” against her, both on account of this very exhibition of contempt on Leicester’s part, and because they thereby “shewed themselves to have a very slender and weak conceit of her judgment, by pressing a minister of hers to accept that which she had refused, as:  though her long experience in government had not taught her to discover what was fit to do in matters of state.”  As the result of such a proceeding would be to disgrace her in the eyes of mankind, by inducing an opinion that her published solemn declaration on this great subject had been intended to abuse the, world, he was directed—­in order to remove the hard conceit justly to be taken by the world, “in consideration of the said contempt,”—­to make a public and open resignation of the government in the place where he had accepted the same.