Egmont set forth upon his journey early in January (1565).  He travelled in great state.  He was escorted as far as Cambray by several nobles of his acquaintance, who improved the occasion by a series of tremendous banquets during the Count’s sojourn, which was protracted till the end of January.  The most noted of these gentlemen were Hoogstraaten, Brederode, the younger Mansfeld, Culemburg, and Noircarmes.  Before they parted with the envoy, they drew up a paper which they signed with their blood, and afterwards placed in the hands of his Countess.  In this document they promised, on account of their “inexpressible and very singular affection” for Egmont, that if, during his mission to Spain, any evil should befal him, they would, on their faith as gentlemen and cavaliers of honor, take vengeance, therefore, upon the Cardinal Granvelle, or upon all who should be the instigators thereof.

[Green v.  P., Archives, etc., i. 345, from Arnoldi, Hist.  Denkwurd, p. 282., It is remarkable that after the return of the Count from.  Spain, Hoogstraaten received this singular bond from the Countess, and gave it to Mansfeld, to be burned in his presence.  Mansfeld, however, advised keeping it, on account of Noircarmes, whose signature was attached to the document, and whom he knew to be so false and deceitful a man that it might be well to have it within their power at some future day to reproach him therewith.—­Ibid.  It will be seen in the sequel that Noircarmes more than justified the opinion of Mansfeld, but that the subsequent career of Mansfeld himself did not entitle him to reproach any of Philip’s noble hangmen.]

Wherever Brederode was, there, it was probable, would be much severe carousing.  Before the conclusion, accordingly, of the visit to Cambray, that ancient city rang with the scandal created by a most uproarious scene.  A banquet was given to Egmont and his friends in the citadel.  Brederode, his cousin Lumey, and the other nobles from Brussels, were all present.  The Archbishop of Cambray, a man very odious to the liberal party in the provinces, was also bidden to the feast.  During the dinner, this prelate, although treated with marked respect by Egmont, was the object of much banter and coarse pleasantry by the ruder portion of the guests.  Especially these convivial gentlemen took infinite pains to overload him with challenges to huge bumpers of wine; it being thought very desirable, if possible; to place the Archbishop under the table.  This pleasantry was alternated with much rude sarcasm concerning the new bishoprics.  The conversation then fell upon other topics, among others, naturally upon the mission of Count Egmont.  Brederede observed that it was a very hazardous matter to allow so eminent a personage to leave the land at such a critical period.  Should any thing happen to the Count, the Netherlands would sustain an immense loss.  The Archbishop, irritated by the previous conversation, ironically