little children.  “Assonleville has told me, as coming from Egmont,” he wrote, “that many of the nobles are dissatisfied with me; hearing from Spain that I am endeavoring to prejudice your Majesty against them.”  Certainly the tone of the Cardinal’s daily letters would have justified such suspicion, could the nobles have seen them.  Granvelle begged the King, however, to disabuse them upon this point.  “Would to God,” said he, piously, “that they all would decide to sustain the authority of your Majesty, and to procure such measures as tend to the service of God and the security of the states.  May I cease to exist if I do not desire to render good service to the very least of these gentlemen.  Your Majesty knows that, when they do any thing for the benefit of your service, I am never silent.  Nevertheless, thus they are constituted.  I hope, however, that this flurry will blow over, and that when your Majesty comes they will all be found to deserve rewards of merit.”

Of Egmont, especially, he often spoke in terms of vague, but somewhat condescending commendation.  He never manifested resentment in his letters, although, as already stated, the Count had occasionally indulged, not only in words, but in deeds of extreme violence against him.  But the Cardinal was too forgiving a Christian, or too keen a politician not to pass by such offences, so long as there was a chance of so great a noble’s remaining or becoming his friend.  He, accordingly, described him, in general, as a man whose principles, in the main, were good, but who was easily led by his own vanity and the perverse counsels of others.  He represented him as having been originally a warm supporter of the new bishoprics, and as having expressed satisfaction that two of them, those of Bruges and Ypres, should have been within his own stadholderate.  He regretted, however; to inform the King that the Count was latterly growing lukewarm, perhaps from fear of finding himself separated from the other nobles.  On the whole, he was tractable enough, said the Cardinal, if he were not easily persuaded by the vile; but one day, perhaps, he might open his eyes again.  Notwithstanding these vague expressions of approbation, which Granvelle permitted himself in his letters to Philip, he never failed to transmit to the monarch every fact, every rumor, every inuendo which might prejudice the royal mind against that nobleman or against any of the noblemen, whose characters he at the same time protested he was most unwilling to injure.

It is true that he dealt mainly by insinuation, while he was apt to conclude his statements with disclaimers upon his own part, and with hopes of improvement in the conduct of the seignors.  At this particular point of time he furnished Philip with a long and most circumstantial account of a treasonable correspondence which was thought to be going on between the leading nobles and the future emperor, Maximilian.  The narrative was a good specimen of the masterly style