indignation.  This behaviour had more effect upon Roda than the suppleness of Capres.  “I am sorry for your misfortune, Count,” said the councillor, without however rising from his chair; “such is the lot of those who take arms against their King.”  This was the unfortunate commencement of Philip Egmont’s career, which was destined to be inglorious, vacillating, base, and on more than one occasion unlucky.

A shiver ran through the country as the news of the horrible crime was spread, but it was a shiver of indignation, not of fear.  Already the negotiations at Ghent between the representatives of the Prince and of Holland and Zealand with the deputies of the other provinces were in a favorable train, and the effect of this event upon their counsels was rather quickening than appalling.  A letter from Jerome de Roda to the King was intercepted, giving an account of the transaction.  In that document the senator gave the warmest praise to Sancho d’Avila, Julian Romero, Alonzo de Vargas, Francis Verdugo, as well as to the German colonels Fugger, Frondsberger, Polwiller, and others who had most exerted themselves in the massacre.  “I wish your Majesty much good of this victory,” concluded the councillor, “’tis a very great one, and the damage to the city is enormous.”  This cynical view was not calculated to produce a soothing effect on the exasperated minds of the people.  On the other hand, the estates of Brabant addressed an eloquent appeal to the states-general, reciting their wrongs, and urging immediate action. “’Tis notorious,” said the remonstrants, “that Antwerp was but yesterday the first and principal ornament of all Europe; the refuge of all the nations of the world; the source and supply of countless treasure; the nurse of all arts and industry; the protectress of the Roman Catholic religion; the guardian of science and virtue; and, above all these preeminences; more than faithful and obedient to her sovereign prince and lord.  The city is now changed to a gloomy cavern, filled with robbers and murderers, enemies of God, the King, and all good subjects.”  They then proceeded to recite the story of the massacre, whereof the memory shall be abominable so long as the world stands, and concluded with an urgent appeal for redress.  They particularly suggested that an edict should forthwith be passed, forbidding the alienation of property and the exportation of goods in any form from Antwerp, together with concession of the right to the proprietors of reclaiming their stolen property summarily, whenever and wheresoever it might be found.  In accordance with these instructions, an edict was passed, but somewhat tardily, in the hope of relieving some few of the evil consequences by which the Antwerp Fury had been attended.