with solemnity and accepted with docility. The
terms of the treaty concluded at Plessis lea Tours
and Bordeaux were made public. The Duke had subscribed
to twenty-seven articles; which made as stringent
and sensible a constitutional compact as could be
desired by any Netherland patriot. These articles,
taken in connection with the ancient charters which
they expressly upheld, left to the new sovereign no
vestige of arbitrary power. He was merely the
hereditary president of a representative republic.
He was to be Duke, Count, Margrave, or Seignior of
the different provinces on the same terms which his
predecessors had accepted. He was to transmit
the dignities to his children. If there were
more than one child, the provinces were to select
one of the number for their sovereign. He was
to maintain all the ancient privileges, charters,
statutes, and customs, and to forfeit his sovereignty
at the first violation. He was to assemble the
states-general at least once a year. He was always
to reside in the Netherlands. He was to permit
none but natives to hold office. His right of
appointment to all important posts was limited to
a selection from three candidates, to be proposed
by the estates of the province concerned, at each vacancy.
He was to maintain “the Religion” and
the religious peace in the same state in which they
then were, or as should afterwards be ordained by the
estates of each province, without making any innovation
on his own part. Holland and Zealand were to
remain as they were, both in the matter of religion
and otherwise. His Highness was not to permit
that any one should be examined or molested in his
house, or otherwise, in the matter or under pretext
of religion. He was to procure the assistance
of the King of France for the Netherlands. He
was to maintain a perfect and a perpetual league,
offensive and defensive, between that kingdom and the
provinces; without; however, permitting any incorporation
of territory. He was to carry on the war against
Spain with his own means and those furnished by his
royal brother, in addition to a yearly, contribution
by the estates of two million four hundred thousand
guldens. He was to dismiss all troops at command
of the states-general. He was to make no treaty
with Spain without their consent.
It would be superfluous to point out the great difference between the notions entertained upon international law in the sixteenth century and in our own. A state of nominal peace existed between Spain, France and England; yet here was the brother of the French monarch, at the head of French troops, and attended by the grandees of England solemnly accepting the sovereignty over the revolted provinces of Spain. It is also curious to observe that the constitutional compact, by which the new sovereign of the Netherlands was admitted to the government, would have been repudiated as revolutionary and republican by the monarchs of France or England, if an attempt had been made to