Such was the purport of the King’s communications to the envoy, as appears from memoranda in the royal handwriting and from the correspondence of Margaret of Parma.  Philip’s exactness in conforming to his instructions is sufficiently apparent, on comparing his statements with the letters previously received from the omnipresent Cardinal.  Beyond the limits of those directions the King hardly hazarded a syllable.  He was merely the plenipotentiary of the Cardinal, as Montigny was of the Regent.  So long as Granvelle’s power lasted, he was absolute and infallible.  Such, then, was the amount of satisfaction derived from the mission of Montigny.  There was to be no diminution of the religious persecution, but the people were assured upon royal authority, that the inquisition, by which they were daily burned and beheaded, could not be logically denominated the Spanish inquisition.  In addition to the comfort, whatever it might be, which the nation could derive from this statement, they were also consoled with the information that Granvelle was not the inventor of the bishoprics.  Although he had violently supported the measure as soon as published, secretly denouncing as traitors and demagogues, all those who lifted their voices against it, although he was the originator of the renewed edicts, although he took, daily, personal pains that this Netherland inquisition, “more pitiless than the Spanish,” should be enforced in its rigor, and although he, at the last, opposed the slightest mitigation of its horrors, he was to be represented to the nobles and the people as a man of mild and unprejudiced character, incapable of injuring even his enemies.  “I will deal with the seigniors most blandly,” the Cardinal had written to Philip, “and will do them pleasure, even if they do not wish it, for the sake of God and your Majesty.”  It was in this light, accordingly, that Philip drew the picture of his favorite minister to the envoy.  Montigny, although somewhat influenced by the King’s hypocritical assurances of the, benignity with which he regarded the Netherlands, was, nevertheless, not to be deceived by this flattering portraiture of a man whom he knew so well and detested so cordially as he did Granvelle.  Solicited by the King, at their parting interview, to express his candid opinion as to the causes of the dissatisfaction in the provinces, Montigny very frankly and most imprudently gave vent to his private animosity towards the Cardinal.  He spoke of his licentiousness, greediness, ostentation, despotism, and assured the monarch that nearly all the inhabitants of the Netherlands entertained the same opinion concerning him.  He then dilated upon the general horror inspired by the inquisition and the great repugnance felt to the establishment of the new episcopates.  These three evils, Granvelle, the inquisition, and the bishoprics, he maintained were the real and sufficient causes of the increasing popular discontent.  Time was to reveal whether the open-hearted envoy was to escape punishment for his frankness, and whether vengeance for these crimes against Granvelle and Philip were to be left wholly, as the Cardinal had lately suggested, in the hands of the Lord.