started, namely, the rites of the barley sheaf, the
loaves of bread, and the booths (Leviticus xxiii.).
But these are mere rites, petrified remains of the
old custom; the actual first-fruits belonging to the
owners of the soil are collected by the priests, the
shadow of them is retained at the festival in the
form of the sheaf offered by the whole community—a
piece of symbolism which has now become quite separated
from its connection and is no longer understood.
And since the giving of thanks for the fruits of
the field has ceased to have any substantial place
in the feasts, the very shadow of connection between
the two also begins to disappear, for the rites of
Leviticus xxiii. are taken over from an older legislation,
and for the most part are passed over in silence in
Numbers xxviii., xxix. Here, again, the passover
has followed a path of its own. Even at an earlier
period, substitution of other cattle and sheep was
permitted. But now in the Priestly Code the
firstlings are strictly demanded indeed, but merely
as dues, not as sacrifices; the passover, always a
yearling lamb or kid, has neither in fact nor in time
anything to do with them, but occupies a separate
position alongside. But as it is represented
to have been instituted in order that the Hebrew first
born may be spared in the destruction of those of the
Egyptians, this connection betrays the fact that the
yearling lambs are after all only a substitute for
the firstlings of all animals fit for sacrifice, but
in comparison with the cattle and sheep of the Jehovistic
tradition and Deuteronomy a secondary substitute, and
one for the uniformity of which there is no motive;
and we see further that if the firstlings are now
over and above assigned to the priests this is equivalent
to a reduplication, which has been made possible first
by a complete obscuration, and afterwards by an artificial
revival of the original custom.
A further symptom also proper to be mentioned here
is the fixing of harvest festival terms by the days
of the month, which is to be found exclusively in
the Priestly Code. Easter falls upon the fifteenth,
that is, at full moon, of the first, the feast of
tabernacles upon the same day of the seventh month;
Pentecost, which, strange to say, is left undetermined
in Numbers xxviii., falls, according to Leviticus
xxiii., seven weeks after Easter. This definite
dating points not merely to a fixed and uniform regulation
of the cultus, but also to a change in its contents.
For it is not a matter of indifference that according
to the Jehovistic-Deuteronomic legislation Easter
is observed in “the month of corn ears”
when the sickle is put to the corn, Pentecost at the
end of the wheat harvest, and the feast of tabernacles
after the ingathering; as harvest feasts they are
from their very nature regulated by the condition
of the fruits of the soil. When they cease to
be so, when they are made to depend upon the phases
of the moon, this means that their connection with