************************************ 1.  Such additions as MCWT YHWH, 1Kings xviii. 18 [LXX has correctly YHWH, without MCWT] (ZBW BRYTK [LXX correctly (ZBW without BRYTK] and more extensive ones, as 1Kings xviii. 31, 32a; 2Samuel vii. 2b [)#R NQR) WGW’’] error! read vi. 2b ) I do not reckon because they proceed from various periods, and are mostly younger than the Deuteronomic revision, and belong rather to textual than to literary criticism.  It is certainly in itself very important to detect and remove these re-touchings.  The whole old tradition is covered with them. *****************************************

question asked with regard to each ruler is, what position he took up to the pure religion—­whether he did what was right or what was evil in the sight of Jehovah.  Even in the case of those who only reigned a week, this question receives an answer.  In general it has to be stated that they did evil.  All except David and Hezekiah and Josiah, were defective, says Jesus Sirach (xlix. 4),—­not quite accurately perhaps, but yet truly in so far as there is always some objection even to the good kings.  But the sin here reproved is no longer, at least not principally, the worship of strange gods; it is the perverted worship of Jehovah.  A more special standard, and therefore a stricter one, is now employed, and we know the reason of this:  the temple having once been built in the place which Jehovah has chosen for Himself, the kindly naturalness hitherto belonging to His worship comes to an end (Deuteronomy xii. 8):  and in particular the prohibition of the bamoth comes into force (1Kings iii. 2).  That these continued to exist is the special sin of the period, a sin widespread and persistent.  It is aggravated by the fact, that with the bamoth all kinds of unlawful abuses crept into the worship of Jehovah, Maccebas and Asheras, evergreen trees, and prostitutes of both sexes.  Israel, continually compared with Judah in the matter, is further charged with a second great sin, the sin of Jeroboam, i.e., the golden calves at Bethel and at Dan.  The religious estimate combines with the chronological facts to form that scheme in which every single reign of the kings of Israel and Judah is uniformly framed.  Sometimes the frame is well filled in with interesting matter, but in not a few cases historical matter is almost entirely absent.  The scheme appears most nakedly in such chapters as 1Kings xv. xvi., 2Kings xiii. xiv. xv.

That this redaction of our book is essentially uniform with that of the two historical books which precede it, requires no proof.  Only it has here a warmer and more lively tone, and a much closer relation to the facts.  In consequence of this we find it much easier to determine the point of view from which it proceeds.  The mere fact that the narrative extends to the destruction of Jerusalem, nay, to the death of the captive king Jehoiachin, shows that we must place the date of the work not earlier than the Babylonian exile, and, indeed, the second part of the exile.  The chronology reckons the exile in the period of 480 years, giving 50 years to it; and this would bring us still lower down; but it is open to us to assume that this is a later modification, which has not further affected the general character of the work. 1