xxxi. 13] which also continue to subsist under circumstances
where as in the exile the conditions of the Mosaic
worship are not present (Genesis ii. 3, xvii. 12, 13).
The trouble which in the meantime the organisers of
the church of the second temple had in forcing into
effect the new and strict regulations is clear from
Nehemiah xiii. 15 seq. But they were ultimately
successful. The solemnisation of the Sabbath
in Judaism continued to develop logically on the basis
of the priestly legislation, but always approximating
with increasing nearness to the idea; of absolute
rest, so that for the straitest sect of the Pharisees
the business of preparing for the sacred day absorbed
the whole week, and half man’s life, so to speak,
existed for it alone. “From Sunday onwards
think of the Sabbath,” says Shammai. Two
details are worthy of special prominence; the distinction
between
yom tob and
shabbath, comparable
to that drawn by the Puritans between Sundays and
feast days, and the discussion as to whether the Sabbath
was broken by divine worship; both bring into recognition
that tendency of the Priestly Code in which the later
custom separates itself from its original roots.
III.IV.2. Connected with the Sabbath is the sabbatical
year. In the Book of the Covenant it is commanded
that a Hebrew who has been bought as a slave must
after six years of service be liberated on the seventh
unless he himself wishes to remain (Exodus xxi. 2-6).
By the same authority it is ordained in another passage
that the land and fruit-gardens are to be wrought
and their produce gathered for six years, but on the
seventh the produce is to be surrendered (#M+), that
the poor of the people may eat, and what they leave
the beasts of the field may at (xxiii. 10, 11).
Here there is no word of a sabbatical year.
The liberation of the Hebrew slave takes place six
years after his purchase, that is, the term is a relative
one. In like manner, in the other ordinance there
is nothing to indicate an absolute seventh year; and
besides, it is not a Sabbath or fallow time for the
land that is contemplated, but a surrender
of the harvest.
The first of these commands is repeated in Deuteronomy
without material alteration, and to a certain extent
word for word (xv. 12-18). The other has at least
an analogue in Deuteronomy xv. 1-6: “At
the end of every seven years thou shalt make a release
(surrender, s*m+h), and this is the manner of it; no
creditor that lendeth aught shall exact it of his
neighbour or of his brother, because Jehovah’s
release has been proclaimed; of a foreigner thou mayst
exact it again, but that which is of thine with thy
brother, thy hand shall release.” That
this precept is parallel with Exodus xxiii. 10, 11,
is shown by the word #m+h~; but this has a different
meaning put upon it which plainly is introduced as
new. Here it is not landed property that is
being dealt with, but money, and what has to be surrendered