“Mr. Motley’s ‘History of the Dutch Republic’ is in my judgment a work of the highest merit.  Unwearying research for years in the libraries of Europe, patience and judgment in arranging and digesting his materials, a fine historical tact, much skill in characterization, the perspective of narration, as it may be called, and a vigorous style unite to make it a very capital work, and place the name of Motley by the side of those of our great historical trio,—­Bancroft, Irving, and Prescott.”

Mr. Irving, Mr. Bancroft, Mr. Sumner, Mr. Hillard, united their voices in the same strain of commendation.  Mr. Prescott, whose estimate of the new history is of peculiar value for obvious reasons, writes to Mr. Allibone thus:—­

“The opinion of any individual seems superfluous in respect to a work on the merits of which the public both at home and abroad have pronounced so unanimous a verdict.  As Motley’s path crosses my own historic field, I may be thought to possess some advantage over most critics in my familiarity with the ground.

“However this may be, I can honestly bear my testimony to the extent of his researches and to the accuracy with which he has given the results of them to the public.  Far from making his book a mere register of events, he has penetrated deep below the surface and explored the cause of these events.  He has carefully studied the physiognomy of the times and given finished portraits of the great men who conducted the march of the revolution.  Every page is instinct with the love of freedom and with that personal knowledge of the working of free institutions which could alone enable him to do justice to his subject.  We may congratulate ourselves that it was reserved for one of our countrymen to tell the story-better than it had yet been told—­of this memorable revolution, which in so many of its features bears a striking resemblance to our own.”

The public welcomed the work as cordially as the critics.  Fifteen thousand copies had already been sold in London in 1857.  In America it was equally popular.  Its author saw his name enrolled by common consent among those of the great writers of his time.  Europe accepted him, his country was proud to claim him, scholarship set its jealously guarded seal upon the result of his labors, the reading world, which had not cared greatly for his stories, hung in delight over a narrative more exciting than romances; and the lonely student, who had almost forgotten the look of living men in the solitude of archives haunted by dead memories, found himself suddenly in the full blaze of a great reputation.

XII.

1856-1857.  AEt. 42-43.

Visit to America.—­Residence in Boylston place.