When she first met Edward Irving, she looked up to him as her superior in many ways.  He was a striking figure in her small world.  He was known in Edinburgh as likely to be a man of mark; and, of course, he had had a careful training in many subjects of which she, as yet, knew very little.  Therefore, insensibly, she fell into a sort of admiration for Irving—­an admiration which might have been transmuted into love.  Irving, on his side, was taken by the young girl’s beauty, her vivacity, and the keenness of her intellect.  That he did not at once become her suitor is probably due to the fact that he had already engaged himself to a Miss Martin, of whom not much is known.

It was about this time, however, that Carlyle became acquainted with Miss Welsh.  His abundant knowledge, his original and striking manner of commenting on it, his almost gigantic intellectual power, came to her as a revelation.  Her studies with Irving were now interwoven with her admiration for Carlyle.

Since Irving was a clergyman, and Miss Welsh had not the slightest belief in any form of theology, there was comparatively little that they had in common.  On the other hand, when she saw the profundities of Carlyle, she at once half feared, and was half fascinated.  Let her speak to him on any subject, and he would at once thunder forth some striking truth, or it might be some puzzling paradox; but what he said could never fail to interest her and to make her think.  He had, too, an infinite sense of humor, often whimsical and shot through with sarcasm.

It is no wonder that Miss Welsh was more and more infatuated with the nature of Carlyle.  If it was her conscious wish to marry a man whom she could reverence as a master, where should she find him—­ in Irving or in Carlyle?

Irving was a dreamer, a man who, she came to see, was thoroughly one-sided, and whose interests lay in a different sphere from hers.  Carlyle, on the other hand, had already reached out beyond the little Scottish capital, and had made his mark in the great world of London, where men like De Quincey and Jeffrey thought it worth their while to run a tilt with him.  Then, too, there was the fascination of his talk, in which Jane Welsh found a perpetual source of interest: 

The English have never had an artist, except in poetry; no musician; no painter.  Purcell and Hogarth are not exceptions, or only such as confirm the rule.

Is the true Scotchman the peasant and yeoman—­chiefly the former?

Every living man is a visible mystery; he walks between two eternities and two infinitudes.  Were we not blind as molea we should value our humanity at infinity, and our rank, influence and so forth—­the trappings of our humanity—­at nothing.  Say I am a man, and you say all.  Whether king or tinker is a mere appendix.

Understanding is to reason as the talent of a beaver—­which can build houses, and uses its tail for a trowel—­to the genius of a prophet and poet.  Reason is all but extinct in this age; it can never be altogether extinguished.