The coming to Paris and settlement there of his friend Matuszynski must have been very gratifying to Chopin, who felt so much the want of one with whom he could sigh.  Matuszynski, who, since we heard last of him, had served as surgeon-major in the Polish insurrectionary army, and taken his doctor’s degree at Tubingen in 1834, proceeded in the same year to Paris, where he was appointed professor at the Ecole de Medecine.  The latter circumstance testifies to his excellent professional qualities, and Chopin’s letters do not leave us in doubt concerning the nature of his qualities as a friend.  Indeed, what George Sand says of his great influence over Chopin only confirms what these letters lead one to think.  In 1834 Matuszynski wrote in a letter addressed to his brother-in-law:—­

The first thing I did in Paris was to call on Chopin.  I cannot tell you how great our mutual happiness was on meeting again after a separation of five years.  He has grown strong and tall; I hardly recognised him.  Chopin is now the first pianist here; he gives a great many lessons, but none under twenty francs.  He has composed much, and his works are in great request.  I live with him:  Rue Chaussee d’Antin, No. 5.  This street is indeed rather far from the Ecole de Medecine and the hospitals; but I have weighty reasons for staying with him—­he is my all!  We spend the evenings at the theatre or pay visits; if we do not do one or the other, we enjoy ourselves quietly at home.

Less interesting than this letter of Matuszynski’s, with its glimpses of Chopin’s condition and habits, are the reminiscences of a Mr. W., now or till lately a music-teacher at Posen, who visited Paris in 1834, and was introduced to Chopin by Dr. A. Hofman. [FOONOTE:  See p. 257.] But, although less interesting, they are by no means without significance, for instance, with regard to the chronology of the composer’s works.  Being asked to play something, Mr. W. chose Kalkbrenner’s variations on one of Chopin’s mazurkas (the one in B major, Op. 7, No. 1).  Chopin generously repaid the treat which Kalkbrenner’s variations and his countryman’s execution may have afforded him, by playing the studies which he afterwards published as Op. 25.

Elsner, like all Chopin’s friends, was pleased with the young artist’s success.  The news he heard of his dear Frederick filled his heart with joy, nevertheless he was not altogether satisfied.  “Excuse my sincerity,” he writes, on September 14, 1834, “but what you have done hitherto I do not yet consider enough.”  Elsner’s wish was that Chopin should compose an opera, if possible one with a Polish historical subject; and this he wished, not so much for the increase of Chopin’s fame as for the advantage of the art.  Knowing his pupil’s talents and acquirements he was sure that what a critic pointed out in Chopin’s mazurkas would be fully displayed and obtain a lasting value only in an opera.  The unnamed critic referred to must be the writer in the “Gazette musicale,” who on June 29, 1834, in speaking of the “Quatre Mazurkas,” Op. 17, says—­