But, it may be asked, was not this languid monotony
which results from the employment of these means just
what Chopin intended? The only reply that can
be made to this otherwise unanswerable objection is,
so much the worse for the artist’s art if he
had such intentions. Chopin’s description
of the Adagio quoted above—remember the
beloved landscape, the beautiful memories, the moonlit
spring night, and the muted violins—hits
off its character admirably. Although Chopin
himself designates the first Allegro as “vigorous”—which
in some passages, at least from the composer’s
standpoint, we may admit it to be—the fundamental
mood of this movement is one closely allied to that
which he says he intended to express in the Adagio.
Look at the first movement, and judge whether there
are not in it more pale moonlight reveries than fresh
morning thoughts. Indeed, the latter, if not
wholly absent, are confined to the introductory bars
of the first subject and some passage-work.
Still, the movement is certainly not without beauty,
although the themes appear somewhat bloodless, and
the passages are less brilliant and piquant than those
in the F minor Concerto. Exquisite softness and
tenderness distinguish the melodious parts, and Chopin’s
peculiar coaxing tone is heard in the semiquaver passage
marked tranquillo of the first subject. The least
palatable portion of the movement is the working-out
section. The pianoforte part therein reminds one
too much of a study, without having the beauty of
Chopin’s compositions thus entitled; and the
orchestra amuses itself meanwhile with reminiscences
of the principal motives. Chopin’s procedure
in this and similar cases is pretty much the same
(F minor Concerto, Krakowiak, &c.), and recalls to
my mind—may the manes of the composer forgive
me—a malicious remark of Rellstab’s.
Speaking of the introduction to the Variations, Op.
2, he says: “The composer pretends to be
going to work out the theme.” It is curious,
and sad at the same time, to behold with what distinction
Chopin treats the bassoon, and how he is repaid with
mocking ingratitude. But enough of the orchestral
rabble. The Adagio is very fine in its way, but
such is its cloying sweetness that one longs for something
bracing and active. This desire the composer
satisfies only partially in the last movement (Rondo
vivace, 2-4, E major). Nevertheless, he succeeds
in putting us in good humour by his gaiety, pretty
ways, and tricksy surprises (for instance, the modulations
from E major to E flat major, and back again to E
major). We seem, however, rather to look on the
play of fantoccini than the doings of men; in short,
we feel here what we have felt more or less strongly
throughout the whole work—there is less
intensity of life and consequently less of human interest
in this than in the F minor Concerto.