therefore to be employed by the Caliph (i.e. the reigning
Sultan) for the exigencies of the faith. The
amount is said to be enormous, which I doubt. [FN#48]
And I might add, never having seen one who has seen
it. Niebuhr is utterly incorrect in his hearsay
description of it. It is not “enclosed
within iron railings for fear lest the people might
surreptitiously offer worship to the ashes of the Prophet.”
The tomb is not “of plain mason-work in the
form of a chest,” nor does any one believe that
it is “placed within or between two other tombs,
in which rest the ashes of the first two Caliphs.”
The traveller appears to have lent a credulous ear
to the eminent Arab merchant, who told him that a
guard was placed over the tomb to prevent the populace
scraping dirt from about it, and preserving it as
a relic. [FN#49] Burckhardt writes this author’s
name El Samhoudy, and in this he is followed by all
our popular book-makers. Moslems have three ways
of spelling it: 1. Al-Samhudi, 2. Al-Samahnudi,
and 3. Al-Samanhudi. I prefer the latter,
believing that the learned Shaykh, Nur al-Din Ali
bin Abdullah al-Hasini (or Al-Husayni) was originally
from Samanhud in Egypt, the ancient Sebennitis.
He died in A.H. 911, and was buried in the Bakia cemetery.
[FN#50] Burckhardt, however, must be in error when
he says “The tombs are also covered with precious
stuffs, and in the shape of catafalques, like that
of Ibrahim in the great Mosque of Meccah.”
The eunuchs positively declare that no one ever approaches
the tomb, and that he who ventured to do so would
at once be blinded by the supernatural light.
Moreover the historians of Al-Madinah all quote tales
of certain visions of the Apostle, directing his tomb
to be cleared of dust that had fallen upon it from
above, in which case some man celebrated for piety
and purity was let through a hole in the roof, by cords,
down to the tomb, with directions to wipe it with
his beard. This style of ingress is explained
by another assertion of Al-Samanhudi, quoted by Burckhardt.
“In A.H. 892, when Kaid-Bey rebuilt the Mosque,
which had been destroyed by lightning, three deep
graves were found in the inside, full of rubbish,
but the author of this history, who himself entered
it, saw no traces of tombs. The original place
of Mohammed’s tomb was ascertained with great
difficulty; the walls of the Hujrah were then rebuilt,
and the iron railing placed round it, which is now
there.” [FN#51] Upon this point authors greatly
disagree. Ibn Jubayr, for instance, says that
Abu Bakr’s head is opposite the Apostle’s
feet, and that Omar’s face is on a level with
Abu Bakr’s shoulder. [FN#52] The vulgar story
of the suspended coffin has been explained in two
ways. Niebuhr supposes it to have arisen from
the rude drawings sold to strangers. Mr. William
Bankes (Giovanni Finati, vol. ii., p. 289) believes
that the mass of rock popularly described as hanging
unsupported in the Mosque of Omar at Jerusalem was
confounded by Christians, who could not have seen