most approved leader is the man who can harmonise discordant
sections, and steer round obvious and pressing difficulties.
Geniality and bonhomie are more valuable qualities
than prescience or nobility of aim. The more
representative that government becomes, the more does
originality give place to malleability. The more
fluid that the conceptions of a statesman are, the
greater that his adaptability is, the more acceptable
he becomes. Since Lord Beaconsfield, with all
his trenchant mystery, and Mr. Gladstone, with his
voluble candour, there have been no figures of unquestioned
supremacy on the political stage. Even so, the
effect in both cases was to a great extent the effect
of personality. The further that these two men
retire into the past, the more that they are judged
by the written record, the more does the tawdriness
of Lord Beaconsfield’s mind, his absence of
sincere convictions appear, as well as the pedestrianism
of Mr. Gladstone’s mind, and his lack of critical
perception. I have heard Mr. Gladstone speak,
and on one occasion I had the task of reporting for
a daily paper a private oration on a literary subject.
I was thrilled to the very marrow of my being by the
address. The parchment pallor of the orator,
his glowing and blazing eyes, his leonine air, the
voice that seemed to have a sort of physical effect
on the nerves, his great sweeping gestures, all held
the audience spellbound. I felt at the time that
I had never before realised the supreme and vital
importance of the subject on which he spoke. But
when I tried to reconstruct from the ashes of my industrious
notes the mental conflagration which I had witnessed,
I was at a complete loss to understand what had happened.
The records were not only dull, they seemed essentially
trivial, and almost overwhelmingly unimportant.
But the magic had been there. Apart from the substance,
the performance had been literally enchanting.
I do not honestly believe that Mr. Gladstone was a
man of great intellectual force, or even of very deep
emotions. He was a man of extraordinarily vigorous
and robust brain, and he was a supreme oratorical artist.
There is intellect, charm, humour in abundance in the parliamentary forces; there was probably never a time when there were so many able and ambitious men to be found in the rank and file of parliamentarians. But that is not enough. There is no supremely impressive and commanding figure on the stage; greatness seems to be distributed rather than concentrated; but probably neither this, nor political conditions, would prevent the generous recognition of supreme genius, if it were there to recognise.