mysteries to himself will be clear and plain.
But he sees, too, how the dim avenues of knowledge
reach out in every direction, interlacing and combining,
and when he contrasts the tiny powers of the most subtle
brain with all the wide range of law—for
the knowledge which is to be, not invented, but simply
discovered, is all assuredly there, secret and complex
as it seems—there is but little room for
complacency or pride. Indeed, I think that a
great savant, as a rule, feels that instead of being
separated by his store of knowledge, as by a wide
space that he has crossed, from smaller minds, he is
brought closer to the ignorant by the presence of
the vast unknown. Instead of feeling that he
has soared like a rocket away from the ground, he
thinks of himself rather as a flower might think whose
head was an inch or two higher than a great company
of similar flowers; he has perhaps a wider view; he
sees the bounding hedgerow, the distant line of hills,
whereas the humbler flower sees little but a forest
of stems and blooms, with the light falling dimly between.
And a great savant, too, is far more ready to credit
other people with a wider knowledge than they possess.
It is the lesser kind of savant, the man of one book,
of one province, of one period, who is inclined to
think that he is differentiated from the crowd.
The great man is far too much preoccupied with real
progress to waste time and energy in showing up the
mistakes of others. It is the lesser kind of
savant, jealous of his own reputation, anxious to
show his superiority, who loves to censure and deride
the feebler brother. If one ever sees a relentless
and pitiless review of a book—an exposure,
as it is called, by one specialist of another’s
work—one may be fairly certain that the
critic is a minute kind of person. Again, the
great specialist is never anxious to obtrude his subject;
he is rather anxious to hear what is going on in other
regions of mental activity, regions which he would
like to explore but cannot. It is the lesser
light that desires to dazzle and bewilder his company,
to tyrannise, to show off. It is the most difficult
thing to get a great savant to talk about his subject,
though, if he is kind and patient, will answer unintelligent
questions, and help a feeble mind along, it is one
of the most delightful things in the world. I
seized the opportunity some little while ago, on finding
myself sitting next to a great physicist, of asking
him a series of fumbling questions on the subject
of modern theories of matter; for an hour I stumbled
like a child, supported by a strong hand, in a dim
and unfamiliar world, among the mysterious essences
of things. I should like to try to reproduce
it here, but I have no doubt I should reproduce it
all wrong. Still, it was deeply inspiring to
look out into chaos, to hear the rush and motion of
atoms, moving in vast vortices, to learn that inside
the hardest and most impenetrable of substances there
was probably a feverish intensity of inner motion.