from Spain of the Contesse D’Anois, vol. ii.
He was brother of the beautiful Comtesse de Konigsmark,
mistress of Augustus the Second, King of Poland. (72)
It was not this Count Konigsmark, but an elder brother,
who was accused of having suborned Colonel Vratz,
Lieutenant Stern, and one George Boroskey, to murder
Mr. Thynne in Pall-Mall, on the 12th of February,
1682, and for which they were executed in that street
on the 10th of March. For the particulars, see
Howell’s State Trials, vol. ix. p. 1, and Sir
John Reresby’s Memoirs, p. 135. “This
day,” says Evelyn, in his Diary of the 10th
of March, “was executed Colonel Vrats, for the
execrable murder of Mr. Thynne, set on by the principal,
Konigsmark: he went to execution like an undaunted
hero, as one that had done a friendly office for that
base coward, Count Konigsmark, who had hopes to marry
his widow, the rich Lady Ogle, and was acquitted by
a corrupt jury, and so got away: Vrats told a
friend of mine, who accompanied him to the gallows,
and gave him some advice, that he did not value dying
of a rush, and hoped and believed God would deal with
him like a gentleman.” Mr. Thynne was buried
in Westminster Abbey; the manner of his death being
represented on his monument. He was the Issachar
of Absalom and Achitophel; in which poem Dryden, describing
the respect and favour with which Monmouth was received
upon his progress in the year 1691, Says: “Hospitable
hearts did most commend Wise Issachar, his wealthy,
western friend.”
Reresby states, that Lady Ogle, immediately after
the marriage, “repenting herself of the match,
fled from him into Holland, before they were bedded.”
This circumstance added to the fact, that Mr. Thynne
had formerly seduced Miss Trevor, one of the maids
of honour to Catherine of Portugal, wife of Charles
ii., gave birth to the following lines:
“Here lies Tom Thynne, of Longleat Hall,
Who never would have miscarried,
Had he married the woman he lay withal,
Or lain with the woman he married.”
On the 30th of May, in the same year, Lady Ogle was
married to
Charles Seymour, Duke of Somerset.-E.
(73) Lady Suffolk thought he rather would have her
regent of Hanover; and she also told me, that George
I. had offered to live again with his wife, but she
refused, unless her pardon were asked publicly.
She said, what most affected her was the disgrace
that would be brought on her children; and if she were
only pardoned, that would not remove it. Lady
Suffolk thought she was then divorced, though the
divorce was never published; and that the old Elector
consented to his son’s marrying the Duchess
of Kendal with the left hand-but it seems strange,
that George I. should offer to live again with his
wife, and yet be divorced front her. Perhaps
George ii. to vindicate his mother, supposed
that offer and her spirited refusal.