untouched Norman interior, that closely repeats the Abbey Church at Mont-Saint-Michel.  “One of the most complete models of Romanesque architecture to be found in Normandy,” says M. de Caumont.  The central clocher will begin a photographic collection of square towers, to replace that which was lost on the Mount; and a second example is near Bayeux, at a small place called Cerisy-la-Foret, where the church matches that on the Mount, according to M. Corroyer; for Cerisy-la-Foret was also an abbey, and the church, built by Richard ii, Duke of Normandy, at the beginning of the eleventh century, was larger than that on the Mount.  It still keeps its central tower.

All this is intensely Norman, and is going to help very little in France; it would be more useful in England; but at Bayeux is a great:  cathedral much more to the purpose, with two superb western towers crowned by stone fleches, cousins of those at Coutances, and distinctly related to the twelfth-century fleche at Chartres.  “The Normans,” says Viollet-le-Duc, “had not that instinct of proportion which the architects of the Ile de France, Beauvais, and Soissons possessed to a high degree; yet the boldness of their constructions, their perfect execution, the elevation of the fleches, had evident influence on the French school properly called, and that influence is felt in the old spire of Chartres.”  The Norman seemed to show distinction in another respect which the French were less quick to imitate.  What they began, they completed.  Not one of the great French churches has two stone spires complete, of the same age, while each of the little towns of Coutances, Bayeux, and Caen contains its twin towers and fleches of stone, as solid and perfect now as they were seven hundred years ago.  Still another Norman character is worth noting, because this is one part of the influence felt at Chartres.  If you look carefully at the two western towers of the Bayeux Cathedral, perhaps you will feel what is said to be the strength of the way they are built up.  They rise from their foundation with a quiet confidence of line and support, which passes directly up to the weather-cock on the summit of the fleches.  At the plane where the square tower is changed into the octagon spire, you will see the corner turrets and the long intermediate windows which effect the change without disguising it.  One can hardly call it a device; it is so simple and evident a piece of construction that it does not need to be explained; yet you will have to carry a photograph of this fleche to Chartres, and from there to Vendome, for there is to be a great battle of fleches about this point of junction, and the Norman scheme is a sort of standing reproach to the French.