Mont-Saint-Michel and Chartres eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 523 pages of information about Mont-Saint-Michel and Chartres.

Mont-Saint-Michel and Chartres eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 523 pages of information about Mont-Saint-Michel and Chartres.
and the energy of the infinite gives substance to the line, all energy at last becomes identical with the ultimate substance, God Himself.  Socrates becomes God in small; Judas is identical with both; humanity is of the divine essence, and exists, wholly and undivided, in each of us.  The equilateral triangle we call humanity exists, therefore, entire, identical, in you and me, as a subdivision of the infinite line, space, energy, or substance, which is God.  I need not remind you that this is pantheism, and that if God is the only energy, human free will merges in God’s free will; the Church ceases to have a reason for existence; man cannot be held responsible for his own acts, either to the Church or to the State; and finally, though very unwillingly, I must, in regard for my own safety, bring the subject to the attention of the Archbishop, which, as you know better than I, will lead to your seclusion, or worse.”

Whether Abelard used these precise words is nothing to the point.  The words he left on record were equivalent to these.  As translated by M. de Remusat from a manuscript entitled:  “Glossulae magistri Petri Baelardi super Porphyrium,” the phrase runs:  “A grave heresy is at the end of this doctrine; for, according to it, the divine substance which is recognized as admitting of no form, is necessarily identical with every substance in particular and with all substance in general.”  Even had he not stated the heresy so bluntly, his objection necessarily pushed William in face of it.  Realism, when pressed, always led to pantheism.  William of Champeaux and Bishop or Archbishop Hildebert were personal friends, and Hildebert’s divine substance left no more room for human free will than Abelard saw in the geometric analogy imagined for William.  Throughout the history of the Church for fifteen hundred years, whenever this theological point has been pressed against churchmen it has reduced them to evasion or to apology.  Admittedly, the weak point of realism was its fatally pantheistic term.

Of course, William consulted his friends in the Church, probably Archbishop Hildebert among the rest, before deciding whether to maintain or to abandon his ground, and the result showed that he was guided by their advice.  Realism was the Roman arch—­the only possible foundation for any Church; because it assumed unity, and any other scheme was compelled to prove it, for a starting-point.  Let us see, for a moment, what became of the dialogue, when pushed into theology, in order to reach some of the reasons which reduced William to tacit abandonment of a doctrine he could never have surrendered unless under compulsion.  That he was angry is sure, for Abelard, by thus thrusting theology into dialectics, had struck him a full blow; and William knew Abelard well:—­

“Ah!” he would have rejoined; “you are quick, M. du Pallet, to turn what I offered as an analogy, into an argument of heresy against my person.  You are at liberty to take that course if you choose, though I give you fair warning that it will lead you far.  But now I must ask you still another question.  This concept that you talk about—­ this image in the mind of man, of God, of matter; for I know not where to seek it—­whether is it a reality or not?”

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
Mont-Saint-Michel and Chartres from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.