50.  Qu.  Whether reflection in the better sort might not soon remedy our evils?  And whether our real defect be not a wrong way of thinking?

51.  Qu.  Whether it would not be an unhappy turn in our gentlemen, if they should take more thought to create an interest to themselves in this or that county, or borough, than to promote the real interest of their country?

52.  Qu.  Whether it be not a bull to call that making an interest, whereby a man spendeth much and gaineth nothing?

53.  Qu.  Whether if a man builds a house he doth not in the first place provide a plan which governs his work?  And shall the pubic act without an end, a view, a plan?

54.  Qu.  Whether by how much the less particular folk think for themselves, the public be not so much the more obliged to think for them?

55.  Qu.  Whether cunning be not one thing and good sense another? and whether a cunning tradesman doth not stand in his own light?

56.  Qu.  Whether small gains be not the way to great profit?  And if our tradesmen are beggars, whether they may not thank themselves for it?

57.  Qu.  Whether some way might not be found for making criminals useful in public works, instead of sending them either to America, or to the other world?

58.  Qu.  Whether we may not, as well as other nations, contrive employment for them?  And whether servitude, chains, and hard labour, for a term of years, would not be a more discouraging as well as a more adequate punishment for felons than even death itself?

59.  Qu.  Whether there are not such things in Holland as bettering houses for bringing young gentlemen to order?  And whether such an institution would be useless among us?

60.  Qu.  Whether it be true that the poor in Holland have no resource but their own labour, and yet there are no beggars in their streets?

61.  Qu.  Whether he whose luxury consumeth foreign products, and whose industry produceth nothing domestic to exchange for them, is not so far forth injurious to his country?

62.  Qu.  Whether, consequently, the fine gentlemen, whose employment is only to dress, drink, and play, be not a pubic nuisance?

63.  Qu.  Whether necessity is not to be hearkened to before convenience, and convenience before luxury?

64.  Qu.  Whether to provide plentifully for the poor be not feeding the root, the substance whereof will shoot upwards into the branches, and cause the top to flourish?

65.  Qu.  Whether there be any instance of a State wherein the people, living neatly and plentifully, did not aspire to wealth?

66.  Qu.  Whether nastiness and beggary do not, on the contrary, extinguish all such ambition, making men listless, hopeless, and slothful?

67.  Qu.  Whether a country inhabited by people well fed, clothed and lodged would not become every day more populous?  And whether a numerous stock of people in such circumstances would? and how far the product of not constitute a flourishing nation; our own country may suffice for the compassing of this end?