43.  Qu.  Whether any man thinks himself the poorer, because his money is in the bank?

44.  Qu.  Whether the creditors of the bank of Amsterdam are not at liberty to withdraw their money when they please, and whether this liberty doth not make them less desirous to use it?

45.  Qu.  Whether this bank be not shut up twice in the year for ten or fifteen days, during which time the accounts are balanced?

46.  Qu.  Whether it be not owing to this bank that the city of Amsterdam, without the least confusion, hazard, or trouble, maintains and every day promotes so general and quick a circulation of industry?

47.  Qu.  Whether it be not the greatest help and spur to commerce that property can be so readily conveyed and so well secured by a compte en banc, that is, by only writing one man’s name for another’s in the bank-book?

48.  Qu.  Whether, at the beginning of the last century, those who had lent money to the public during the war with Spain were not satisfied by the sole expedient of placing their names in a compte en banc, with liberty to transfer their claims?

49.  Qu.  Whether the example of those easy transfers in the compte en banc, thus casually erected, did not tempt other men to become creditors to the public, in order to profit by the same secure and expeditious method of keeping and transferring their wealth?

50.  Qu.  Whether this compte en banc hath not proved better than a mine of gold to Amsterdam?

51.  Qu.  Whether that city may not be said to owe her greatness to the unpromising accident of her having been in debt more than she was able to Pay?

52.  Qu.  Whether it be known that any State from such small beginnings, in so short a time, ever grew to so great wealth and power as the province of Holland hath done; and whether the bank of Amsterdam hath not been the real cause of such extraordinary growth?

53.  Qu.  Whether we are by nature a more stupid people than the Dutch?  And yet whether these things are sufficiently considered by our patriots?

54.  Qu.  Whether anything less than the utter subversion of those Republics can break the banks of Venice and Amsterdam?

55.  Qu.  Whether at Hamburgh the citizens have not the management of the bank, without the meddling or inspection of the Senate?

56.  Qu.  Whether the directors be not four principal burghers chosen by plurality of voices, whose business is to see the rules observed, and furnish the cashiers with money?

57.  Qu.  Whether the book-keepers are not obliged to balance their accounts every week, and exhibit them to the controllers or directors?

58.  Qu.  Whether any besides the citizens are admitted to have compte en banc at Hamburgh?

59.  Qu.  Whether there be not a certain limit, under which no sum can be entered into the bank?

60.  Qu.  Whether each particular person doth not pay a fee in order to be admitted to a compte en banc at Hamburgh and Amsterdam?