not be poisonous to other plants of a different kind.
Thus, by rotation of crops, good crops could be grown
indefinitely on the same land without the addition
of plant food. He said that the soil water alone
dissolved plenty of plant food from all soils for
the production of good crops, and that the supply
of plant food will be permanently maintained, because
the plant food contained in the subsoil far below
where the roots go is being brought to the surface
by the rise of the capillary moisture, and that there
is in fact a steady tendency toward an accumulation
of plant food in the surface soil. He said that
it is never necessary to apply fertilizing material
to any soil for the purpose of increasing the supply
of plant food in that soil. He admitted that
applications of fertilizers sometimes produce increased
crop yields, but that the effect was due to the power
of the fertilizer to destroy the toxic substances
excreted by the plants, and this is really the principal
effect of potash, phosphates, and nitrates, and also
of farm manure and green manures. Humus, he said,
is one of the very best substances for destroying
these toxic excrete although they had some other things
which were as good or better than any sore of fertilizing
materials. He mentioned especially a substance
called pyrogallol, which cost $2.00 a pound, and of
course it could not be applied on a large scale; but
it was as good a fertilizer as anything, although
it contains nothing but carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen,
which, as you explained to me when you were here before,
the plants secure in abundance from air and water.
This information had been secured in the laboratories
at Washington by growing wheat seedlings in water
culture for twenty-day periods.”
“I have already heard something of those theories,”
said Percy, “but I shall be glad to have you
tell me more about them. As I understand them,
we need only to rotate and cultivate and our lands
should always continue to produce bountiful crops.
Is that correct?”
“I understand that is the theory,” replied
Mr. West, “but I know it is not correct for
my grandfather used to grow two or three times as
much wheat per acre as I can grow, and I rotate much
more than he did. In fact I can grow only ten
to fifteen bushels of wheat per acre once in ten years,
whereas he grew from twenty-five to forty bushels
per acre in a five-year rotation; and I don’t
see that there is any particular connection between
the growing of wheat seedlings in small pots or bottles
for a few twenty-day periods and the growing of crops
in soils during successive seasons. No, I don’t
take any stock in their theories. I think they
are watered, or perhaps I should say hydrated,
in deference to science. But I would like
to know about this question of plant food coming up
from below. That would be a happy solution of
the fertilizer problem.”