I am reminded by Mr. Romfrey’s profound disappointment in the youth, that it will be repeatedly shared by many others:  and I am bound to forewarn readers of this history that there is no plot in it.  The hero is chargeable with the official disqualification of constantly offending prejudices, never seeking to please; and all the while it is upon him the narrative hangs.  To be a public favourite is his last thought.  Beauchampism, as one confronting him calls it, may be said to stand for nearly everything which is the obverse of Byronism, and rarely woos your sympathy, shuns the statuesque pathetic, or any kind of posturing.  For Beauchamp will not even look at happiness to mourn its absence; melodious lamentations, demoniacal scorn, are quite alien to him.  His faith is in working and fighting.  With every inducement to offer himself for a romantic figure, he despises the pomades and curling-irons of modern romance, its shears and its labels:  in fine, every one of those positive things by whose aid, and by some adroit flourishing of them, the nimbus known as a mysterious halo is produced about a gentleman’s head.  And a highly alluring adornment it is!  We are all given to lose our solidity and fly at it; although the faithful mirror of fiction has been showing us latterly that a too superhuman beauty has disturbed popular belief in the bare beginnings of the existence of heroes:  but this, very likely, is nothing more than a fit of Republicanism in the nursery, and a deposition of the leading doll for lack of variety in him.  That conqueror of circumstances will, the dullest soul may begin predicting, return on his cockhorse to favour and authority.  Meantime the exhibition of a hero whom circumstances overcome, and who does not weep or ask you for a tear, who continually forfeits attractiveness by declining to better his own fortunes, must run the chances of a novelty during the interregnum.  Nursery Legitimists will be against him to a man; Republicans likewise, after a queer sniff at his pretensions, it is to be feared.  For me, I have so little command over him, that in spite of my nursery tastes, he drags me whither he lists.  It is artless art and monstrous innovation to present so wilful a figure, but were I to create a striking fable for him, and set him off with scenic effects and contrasts, it would be only a momentary tonic to you, to him instant death.  He could not live in such an atmosphere.  The simple truth has to be told:  how he loved his country, and for another and a broader love, growing out of his first passion, fought it; and being small by comparison, and finding no giant of the Philistines disposed to receive a stone in his fore-skull, pummelled the obmutescent mass, to the confusion of a conceivable epic.  His indifferent England refused it to him.  That is all I can say.  The greater power of the two, she seems, with a quiet derision that does not belie her amiable passivity, to have reduced in Beauchamp’s career the boldest readiness for public action, and some good stout efforts besides, to the flat result of an optically discernible influence of our hero’s character in the domestic circle; perhaps a faintly-outlined circle or two beyond it.  But this does not forbid him to be ranked as one of the most distinguishing of her children of the day he lived in.  Blame the victrix if you think he should have been livelier.