They create by stoppage a volcano, and are amazed at its eruptiveness.  ‘We live alone, and do not much feel it till we are visited.’  Love is presumably the visitor.  Of the greater loneliness of women, she says:  ’It is due to the prescribed circumscription of their minds, of which they become aware in agitation.  Were the walls about them beaten down, they would understand that solitariness is a common human fate and the one chance of growth, like space for timber.’  As to the sensations of women after the beating down of the walls, she owns that the multitude of the timorous would yearn in shivering affright for the old prison-nest, according to the sage prognostic of men; but the flying of a valiant few would form a vanguard.  And we are informed that the beginning of a motive life with women must be in the head, equally with men (by no means a truism when she wrote).  Also that ’men do not so much fear to lose the hearts of thoughtful women as their strict attention to their graces.’  The present market is what men are for preserving:  an observation of still reverberating force.  Generally in her character of the feminine combatant there is a turn of phrase, like a dimple near the lips showing her knowledge that she was uttering but a tart measure of the truth.  She had always too much lambent humour to be the dupe of the passion wherewith, as she says, ’we lash ourselves into the persuasive speech distinguishing us from the animals.’

The instances of her drollery are rather hinted by the Diarists for the benefit of those who had met her and could inhale the atmosphere at a word.  Drolleries, humours, reputed witticisms, are like odours of roast meats, past with the picking of the joint.  Idea is the only vital breath.  They have it rarely, or it eludes the chronicler.  To say of the great erratic and forsaken Lady A****, after she had accepted the consolations of Bacchus, that her name was properly signified in asterisks ‘as she was now nightly an Ariadne in heaven through her God,’ sounds to us a roundabout, with wit somewhere and fun nowhere.  Sitting at the roast we might have thought differently.  Perry Wilkinson is not happier in citing her reply to his compliment on the reviewers’ unanimous eulogy of her humour and pathos:—­the ’merry clown and poor pantaloon demanded of us in every work of fiction,’ she says, lamenting the writer’s compulsion to go on producing them for applause until it is extremest age that knocks their knees.  We are informed by Lady Pennon of ’the most amusing description of the first impressions of a pretty English simpleton in Paris’; and here is an opportunity for ludicrous contrast of the French and English styles of pushing flatteries—­’piping to the charmed animal,’ as Mrs. Warwick terms it in another place:  but Lady Pennon was acquainted with the silly woman of the piece, and found her amusement in the ‘wonderful truth’ of that representation.