Commonplaces continued to be Wilfrid’s refuge, for sentiment was surging mightily within him.  The commonplaces concerning father, sisters, health, weather, sickened him when uttered, so much that for a time he was unobservant of Emilia’s ready exchange of them.  To a compliment on her appearance, she said:  “You like this dress?  I will tell you the history of it.  I call it the Branciani dress.  Mr. Powys designed it for me.  The Countess Branciani was his friend.  She used always to dress in this colour; just in this style.  She also was dark.  And she imagined that her husband favoured the Austrians.  She believed he was an Austrian spy.  It was impossible for her not to hate him—­”

“Her husband!” quoth Wilfrid.  The unexpected richness that had come upon her beauty and the coolness of her prattle at such an interview amazed and mortified him.

“She supposed him to be an Austrian spy!”

“Still he was her husband!”

Emilia gave her features a moment’s play, but she had not full command of them, and the spark of scorn they emitted was very slight.

“Ah!” his tone had fallen into a depth, “how I thank you for the honour you have done me in desiring to see me once before you leave England!  I know that I have not merited it.”

More he said on this theme, blaming himself emphatically, until, startled by the commonplaces he was uttering, he stopped short; and the stopping was effective, if the speech was not.  Where was the tongue of his passion?  He almost asked it of himself.  Where was Hippogriff?  He who had burned to see her, he saw her now, fair as a vision, and yet in the flesh!  Why was he as good as tongue-tied in her presence when he had such fires to pour forth?

(Presuming that he has not previously explained it, the philosopher here observes that Hippogriff, the foal of Fiery Circumstance out of Sentiment, must be subject to strong sentimental friction before he is capable of a flight:  his appetites must fast long in the very eye of provocation ere he shall be eloquent.  Let him, the Philosopher, repeat at the same time that souls harmonious to Nature, of whom there are few, do not mount this animal.  Those who have true passion are not at the mercy of Hippogriff—­otherwise Sur-excited Sentiment.  You will mark in them constantly a reverence for the laws of their being, and a natural obedience to common sense.  They are subject to storm, as in everything earthly, and they need no lesson of devotion; but they never move to an object in a madness.)

Now this is good teaching:  it is indeed my Philosopher’s object—­his purpose—­to work out this distinction; and all I wish is that it were good for my market.  What the Philosopher means, is to plant in the reader’s path a staring contrast between my pet Emilia and his puppet Wilfrid.  It would be very commendable and serviceable if a novel were what he thinks it:  but all attestation favours the critical dictum, that a novel is to give us copious sugar and no cane.  I, myself, as a reader, consider concomitant cane an adulteration of the qualities of sugar.  My Philosopher’s error is to deem the sugar, born of the cane, inseparable from it.  The which is naturally resented, and away flies my book back at the heads of the librarians, hitting me behind them a far more grievous blow.