themselves as lovers of wisdom, but rather as disagreeable
fools and dangerous interrogators—have found
their mission, their hard, involuntary, imperative
mission (in the end, however, the greatness of their
mission), in being the bad conscience of their age.
In putting the vivisector’s knife to the breast
of the very virtues of their age,
they have betrayed their own secret; it has been for
the sake of a new greatness of man, a new untrodden
path to his aggrandizement. They have always
disclosed how much hypocrisy, indolence, self-indulgence,
and self-neglect, how much falsehood was concealed
under the most venerated types of contemporary morality,
how much virtue was outlived, they have always
said “We must remove hence to where you
are least at home” In the face of a world of
“modern ideas,” which would like to confine
every one in a corner, in a “specialty,”
a philosopher, if there could be philosophers nowadays,
would be compelled to place the greatness of man, the
conception of “greatness,” precisely in
his comprehensiveness and multifariousness, in his
all-roundness, he would even determine worth and rank
according to the amount and variety of that which
a man could bear and take upon himself, according to
the extent to which a man could stretch his responsibility
Nowadays the taste and virtue of the age weaken and
attenuate the will, nothing is so adapted to the spirit
of the age as weakness of will consequently, in the
ideal of the philosopher, strength of will, sternness,
and capacity for prolonged resolution, must specially
be included in the conception of “greatness”,
with as good a right as the opposite doctrine, with
its ideal of a silly, renouncing, humble, selfless
humanity, was suited to an opposite age—such
as the sixteenth century, which suffered from its
accumulated energy of will, and from the wildest torrents
and floods of selfishness In the time of Socrates,
among men only of worn-out instincts, old conservative
Athenians who let themselves go—“for
the sake of happiness,” as they said, for the
sake of pleasure, as their conduct indicated—and
who had continually on their lips the old pompous
words to which they had long forfeited the right by
the life they led, irony was perhaps necessary
for greatness of soul, the wicked Socratic assurance
of the old physician and plebeian, who cut ruthlessly
into his own flesh, as into the flesh and heart of
the “noble,” with a look that said plainly
enough “Do not dissemble before me! here—we
are equal!” At present, on the contrary, when
throughout Europe the herding-animal alone attains
to honours, and dispenses honours, when “equality
of right” can too readily be transformed into
equality in wrong—I mean to say into general
war against everything rare, strange, and privileged,
against the higher man, the higher soul, the higher
duty, the higher responsibility, the creative plenipotence
and lordliness—at present it belongs to