We must therefore, I think, have recourse to feeble and humble palliatives such as I have suggested. With good sense, good judgment, and good care, I have no doubt that they may be enough. But I have written in vain if I require to say now that the problem is delicate, that the solution is varying and difficult, and that the result is inestimable to us all.
Appendix.
Note A.
Liabilities and Cash Reserve of the Chief Banking Systems.
The following is a comparison of the liabilities to the public, and of the cash reserve, of the banking systems of the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and the United States. For the United Kingdom the figures are the most defective, as they only include the deposits of the Bank of England, and of the London joint stock banks, and the banking reserve of the Bank of England, which is the only cash available against these liabilities is also the only cash reserve against the similar liabilities of the London private banks, the provincial English banks, and the Scotch and Irish banks. In the case of England, therefore, the method of comparison exhibits a larger proportion of cash to liabilities than what really exists.
(1) English banking.
Liabilities.
Deposits of Bank of England, less
estimated Joint Stock Bank balances, at December 31,
1872 L 29,000,000
Deposits of London Joint Stock Banks
at December 31 1872 (see ‘Economist,’
February 8, 1873) L 91,000,000
Total liabilities L 120,000,000
Reserve of Cash
Banking Reserve in Bank of England. L 13,500,000
Making proportion of cash reserve to liabilities to the public about 11’2 per cent.
(2) Bank of France (February, 1873).
Liabilities
Circulation L 110,000,000
Deposits L 15,000,000
Total liabilities L 125,000,000
Reserve of Cash.
Coin and bullion in hand L 32,000,000
Making proportion of cash reserve to liabilities to the public about 25 per cent.
(3) Banks of Germany (January, 1873).
Liabilities
Circulation L 63,000,000
Deposits L 8,000,000
Acceptances and Indorsements L 17,000,000
Total liabilities L 88,000,000