Capital L  Dividend
Bank of Scotland            1,500,000   12
British Linen Company       1,000,000    3
Caledonian                    125,000   10
Clydesdale                    900,000   10
Commercial Bank of Scotland 1,000,000   13
National Bank of Scotland   1,000,000  112
North of Scotland             280,000   10
Union Bank of Scotland      1,000,000   10
City of Glasgow               870,000    8
Royal Bank                  2,000,000    8
9,675,000

Good profits enough, but not at all like the profits of the London and Westminster, or the other most lucrative banks of the South.

’The Bank of England, it is true, does not seem to pay so much as other English banks in this way of reckoning.  It makes an immense profit, but then its capital is immense too.  In fact, the Bank of England suffers under two difficulties.  Being much older than the other joint stock banks, it belongs to a less profitable era.  When it was founded, banks looked rather to the profit on their own capital, and to the gains of note issue than to the use of deposits.  The first relations with the State were more like those of a finance company than of a bank, as we now think of banking.  If the Bank had not made loans to the Government, which we should now think dubious, the Bank would not have existed, for the Government would never have permitted it.  Not only is the capital of the Bank of England relatively greater, but the means of making profit in the Bank of England are relatively less also.  By custom and understanding the Bank of England keep a much greater reserve in unprofitable cash than other banks; if they do not keep it, either our whole system must be changed or we should break up in utter bankruptcy.  The earning faculty of the Bank of England is in proportion less than that of other banks, and also the sum on which it has to pay dividend is altogether greater than theirs.

’It is interesting to compare the facts of joint stock banking with the fears of it which were felt.  In 1832, Lord Overstone observed:  “I think that joint stock banks are deficient in everything requisite for the conduct of the banking business except extended responsibility; the banking business requires peculiarly persons attentive to all its details, constantly, daily, and hourly watchful of every transaction, much more than mercantile or trading business.  It also requires immediate prompt decisions upon circumstances when they arise, in many cases a decision that does not admit of delay for consultation; it also requires a discretion to be exercised with reference to the special circumstances of each case.  Joint stock banks being of course obliged to act through agents and not by a principal, and therefore under the restraint of general rules, cannot be guided by so nice a reference to degrees of difference in the character of responsibility of parties; nor can they undertake to regulate the assistance to be granted to concerns under temporary embarrassment by so accurate a reference to the circumstances, favourable or unfavourable, of each case.”