and angered the more moderate Boers in the Transvaal,
who were not without sympathy with the Uitlanders.
It aroused the indignation of the Cape Colony Boers,
and embittered racial feeling there. It put the
British cause in the wrong in the eyes of the whole
world, and made the Boers appear as a gallant little
people struggling in the folds of a merciless python-empire.
It increased immensely the difficulty of the British
government in negotiating with the Transvaal for better
treatment of the Uitlanders. It stiffened the
backs of Kruger and his party. The German Kaiser
telegraphed his congratulations on the defeat of the
Raid ’without the aid of friendly powers,’
and the implication that this aid would be forthcoming
in case of necessity led the Boers to believe that
they could count on German help in a struggle with
Britain. So every concession to the Uitlanders
was obstinately refused; and after three years more
of fruitless negotiation, during which German munitions
were pouring into the Transvaal, the South African
War began. It may be that the war could have been
avoided by the exercise of patience. It may be
that the imperialist spirit, which was very strong
in Britain at that period, led to the adoption of
a needlessly high-handed tone. But it was neither
greed nor tyranny on Britain’s part which brought
about the conflict, but simply the demand for equal
rights.
The war was one in which all the appearances were
against Britain, and the whole world condemned British
greed and aggression. It was a case of Goliath
fighting David, the biggest empire in the world attacking
two tiny republics; yet the weaker side is not necessarily
always in the right. It seemed to be a conflict
for the possession of gold-mines; yet Britain has
never made, and never hoped to make, a penny of profit
out of these mines, which remained after the war in
the same hands as before it. It was a case of
the interests of financiers and gold-hunters against
those of simple and honest farmers; yet even financiers
have rights, and even farmers can be unjust.
In reality the issue was a quite simple and straightforward
one. It was the issue of racial ascendancy against
racial equality, and as her traditions bade her, Britain
strove for racial equality. It was the issue of
self-government for the whole community as against
the entrenched dominion of one section; and there
was no question on which side the history of Britain
must lead her to range herself. Whatever the
rest of the world might say, the great self-governing
colonies, which were free to help or not as they thought
fit, had no doubts at all. They all sent contingents
to take part in the war, because they knew it to be
a war for principles fundamental to themselves.