at the heart of that resurgent unrest in our young
man which we have had to content ourselves with calling
his irritation—deep in the bosom of this
falsity of position glowed the red spark of his inextinguishable
sense of a higher and braver propriety. There
were situations that were ridiculous, but that one
couldn’t yet help, as for instance when one’s
wife chose, in the most usual way, to make one so.
Precisely here, however, was the difference; it had
taken poor Maggie to invent a way so extremely unusual—yet
to which, none the less, it would be too absurd that
he should merely lend himself. Being thrust,
systematically, with another woman, and a woman one
happened, by the same token, exceedingly to like, and
being so thrust that the theory of it seemed to publish
one as idiotic or incapable—this
was
a predicament of which the dignity depended all on
one’s own handling. What was supremely grotesque,
in fact, was the essential opposition of theories—as
if a galantuomo, as
he at least constitutionally
conceived galantuomini, could do anything
but
blush to “go about” at such a rate with
such a person as Mrs. Verver in a state of childlike
innocence, the state of our primitive parents before
the Fall. The grotesque theory, as he would have
called it, was perhaps an odd one to resent with violence,
and he did it—also as a man of the world—all
merciful justice; but, assuredly, none the less, there
was but one way
really to mark, and for his companion
as much as for himself, the commiseration in which
they held it. Adequate comment on it could only
be private, but it could also at least be active,
and of rich and effectual comment Charlotte and he
were fortunately alike capable. Wasn’t this
consensus literally their only way not to be ungracious?
It was positively as if the measure of their escape
from that danger were given by the growth between
them, during their auspicious visit, of an exquisite
sense of complicity.
XXI
He found himself therefore saying, with gaiety, even
to Fanny Assingham, for their common, concerned glance
at Eaton Square, the glance that was so markedly never,
as it might have been, a glance at Portland Place:
“What would our cari sposi have made of
it here? what would they, you know, really?”—which
overflow would have been reckless if, already, and
surprisingly perhaps even to himself, he had not got
used to thinking of this friend as a person in whom
the element of protest had of late been unmistakably
allayed. He exposed himself of course to her
replying: “Ah, if it would have been so
bad for them, how can it be so good for you?”—but,
quite apart from the small sense the question would
have had at the best, she appeared already to unite
with him in confidence and cheer. He had his view,
as well—or at least a partial one—of
the inner spring of this present comparative humility,
which was all consistent with the retraction he had
practically seen her make after Mr. Verver’s