that the advice of the two last-mentioned persons had
great weight in persuading him to the unjustifiable
step of declaring himself king. But far the
most guilty act of this unfortunate man’s life
was his lending his name to the declaration which was
published at Lyme, and in this instance Ferguson,
who penned the paper, was both the adviser and the
instrument. To accuse the king of having burnt
London, murdered Essex in the Tower, and, finally,
poisoned his brother, unsupported by evidence to substantiate
such dreadful charges, was calumny of the most atrocious
kind; but the guilt is still heightened, when we observe,
that from no conversation of Monmouth, nor, indeed,
from any other circumstance whatever, do we collect
that he himself believed the horrid accusations to
be true. With regard to Essex’s death in
particular, the only one of the three charges which
was believed by any man of common sense, the late
king was as much implicated in the suspicion as James.
That the latter should have dared to be concerned
in such an act, without the privacy of his brother,
was too absurd an imputation to be attempted, even
in the days of the popish plot. On the other
hand, it was certainly not the intention of the son
to brand his father as an assassin. It is too
plain that, in the instance of this declaration, Monmouth,
with a facility highly criminal, consented to set
his name to whatever Ferguson recommended as advantageous
to the cause. Among the many dreadful circumstances
attending civil wars, perhaps there are few more revolting
to a good mind than the wicked calumnies with which,
in the heat of contention, men, otherwise men of honour,
have in all ages and countries permitted themselves
to load their adversaries. It is remarkable
that there is no trace of the divines who attended
this unfortunate man having exhorted him to a particular
repentance of his manifesto, or having called for a
retraction or disavowal of the accusations contained
in it. They were so intent upon points more
immediately connected with orthodoxy of faith, that
they omitted pressing their penitent to the only declaration
by which he could make any satisfactory atonement to
those whom he had injured.
FRAGMENTS.
The following detached paragraphs were probably intended for the fourth chapter. They are here printed in the incomplete and unfinished state in which they were found.
While the Whigs considered all religious opinions with a view to politics, the Tories, on the other hand, referred all political maxims to religion. Thus the former, even in their hatred to popery, did not so much regard the superstition, or imputed idolatry of that unpopular sect, as its tendency to establish arbitrary power in the State, while the latter revered absolute monarchy as a divine institution, and cherished the doctrines of passive obedience and non-resistance as articles of religious faith.