we have taken as our basis of belief.  As I have already confessed, the Scheme of Salvation, the idea of a process of sorrow and atonement, presents itself to me as adequately true.  So far I do not think my new faith breaks with my old.  But it follows as a natural consequence of my metaphysical preliminaries that I should find the Christian theology Aristotelian, over defined and excessively personified.  The painted figure of that bearded ancient upon the Sistine Chapel, or William Blake’s wild-haired, wild-eyed Trinity, convey no nearer sense of God to me than some mother-of-pearl-eyed painted and carven monster from the worship of the South Sea Islanders.  And the Miltonic fable of the offended creator and the sacrificial son! it cannot span the circle of my ideas; it is a little thing, and none the less little because it is intimate, flesh of my flesh and spirit of my spirit, like the drawings of my youngest boy.  I put it aside as I would put aside the gay figure of a costumed officiating priest.  The passage of time has made his canonicals too strange, too unlike my world of common thought and costume.  These things helped, but now they hinder and disturb.  I cannot bring myself back to them...

But the psychological experience and the theology of Christianity are only a ground-work for its essential feature, which is the conception of a relationship of the individual believer to a mystical being at once human and divine, the Risen Christ.  This being presents itself to the modern consciousness as a familiar and beautiful figure, associated with a series of sayings and incidents that coalesce with a very distinct and rounded-off and complete effect of personality.  After we have cleared off all the definitions of theology, He remains, mystically suffering for humanity, mystically asserting that love in pain and sacrifice in service are the necessary substance of Salvation.  Whether he actually existed as a finite individual person in the opening of the Christian era seems to me a question entirely beside the mark.  The evidence at this distance is of imperceptible force for or against.  The Christ we know is quite evidently something different from any finite person, a figure, a conception, a synthesis of emotions, experiences and inspirations, sustained by and sustaining millions of human souls.

Now it seems to be the common teaching of almost all Christians, that Salvation, that is to say the consolidation and amplification of one’s motives through the conception of a general scheme or purpose, is to be attained through the personality of Christ.  Christ is made cardinal to the act of Faith.  The act of Faith, they assert, is not simply, as I hold it to be, belief, but belief in him.

We are dealing here, be it remembered, with beliefs deliberately undertaken and not with questions of fact.  The only matters of fact material here are facts of experience.  If in your experience Salvation is attainable through Christ, then certainly Christianity is true for you.  And if a Christian asserts that my belief is a false light and that presently I shall “come to Christ,” I cannot disprove his assertion.  I can but disbelieve it.  I hesitate even to make the obvious retort.