will comfort me by its evidence of unusual insight
or sympathy. Yesterday he read your article in
The Melbourne Review, and said at the end—’This
is an excellently written article, which would do
credit to any English periodical’ adding the
very uncommon testimony, ‘I shall keep this.’
Then he told me of some passages in it which gratified
me by that comprehension of my meaning—
that laying of the finger on the right spot—which
is more precious than praise, and forthwith he went
to lay The Melbourne Review in the drawer he assigns
to any writing about me that gives him pleasure.
For he feels on my behalf more than I feel on my own,
at least in matters of this kind. If you come
to England again when I happen to be in town I hope
that you will give me the pleasure of seeing you under
happier auspices than those of your former visit.—I
am, dear madam, yours sincerely, M. G. Lewes.”
The receipt of this kind and candid letter gave me
much pleasure; and, although on the strength of that,
I cannot boast of being a correspendent of that great
woman, I was able to say that I had seen and talked
with her, and that she considered me a competent critic
of her work. Mrs. Oliphant says that George Eliot’s
life impelled her to make an involuntary confession—“How
have I been handicapped in life? Should I have
done better if I had been kept, like her, in a mental
green-house and taken care of? I have always had
to think of other people and to plan everything for
my own pleasure, it is true, very often, but always
in subjection to the necessity which bound me to them.
To bring up the boys—my own and Frank’s—for
the service of God was better than to write a fine
novel, if it had been in my power to do so.”
The heart knows its own bitterness. There might
have been some points in which George Eliot might
have envied Mrs. Oliphant.
CHAPTER X.
RETURN FROM THE OLD COUNTRY.
Before leaving Scotland I arranged that my friend,
Mrs. Graham of the strenuous life and 30 pounds a
year, should undertake the care of my aunts, to their
mutual satisfaction. My last days in England were
spent in either a thick London fog or an equally undesirable
Scotch mist, which shrouded everything in obscurity,
and made me long for the sunny skies and the clear
atmosphere of Australia. I told my friends that
in my country it either rained or let it alone.
Indeed, the latest news from all Australia was that
it had let it alone very badly, and that the overstocking
of stations during the preceding good seasons had led
to enormous losses. Sheepfarmers made such large
profits in good seasons that they were apt to calculate
that it was worth while to run the risk of drought;
but experience has shown that overstocking does not
really pay. The making of dams, the private and
public provision of water in the underground reservoirs
by artesian bores, and the facilities for travelling
stock by such ways have all lessened the risks which