me, they called in Captain Cocke, with whom they were
shorter; and I do fear he may answer foolishly, for
he did speak to me foolishly before he went in; but
I hope to preserve myself, and let him shift for himself
as well as he can. So I away, walked to my flageolet
maker in the Strand, and there staid for Captain Cocke,
who took me up and carried me home, and there coming
home and finding dinner done, and Mr. Cooke, who come
for my Lady Sandwich’s plate, which I must part
with, and so endanger the losing of my money, which
I lent upon my thoughts of securing myself by that
plate. But it is no great sum—but
L60: and if it must be lost, better that, than
a greater sum. I away back again, to find a dinner
anywhere else, and so I, first, to the Ship Tavern,
thereby to get a sight of the pretty mistress of the
house, with whom I am not yet acquainted at all, and
I do always find her scolding, and do believe she
is an ill-natured devil, that I have no great desire
to speak to her. Here I drank, and away by coach
to the Strand, there to find out Mr. Moore, and did
find him at the Bell Inn, and there acquainted him
with what passed between me and the Commissioners
to-day about the prize goods, in order to the considering
what to do about my Lord Sandwich, and did conclude
to own the thing to them as done by the King’s
allowance, and since confirmed. Thence to other
discourse, among others, he mightily commends my Lord
Hinchingbroke’s match and Lady, though he buys
her L10,000 dear, by the jointure and settlement his
father makes her; and says that the Duke of York and
Duchess of York did come to see them in bed together,
on their wedding-night, and how my Lord had fifty
pieces of gold taken out of his pocket that night,
after he was in bed. He tells me that an Act
of Comprehension is likely to pass this Parliament,
for admitting of all persuasions in religion to the
public observation of their particular worship, but
in certain places, and the persons therein concerned
to be listed of this, or that Church; which, it is
thought, will do them more hurt than good, and make
them not own, their persuasion. He tells me
that there is a pardon passed to the Duke of Buckingham,
my Lord of Shrewsbury, and the rest, for the late duell
and murder;
[The royal pardon was thus announced in the “Gazette” of February 24th, 1668: “This day his Majesty was pleased to declare at the Board, that whereas, in contemplation of the eminent services heretofore done to his Majesty by most of the persons who were engaged in the late duel, or rencounter, wherein William Jenkins was killed, he Both graciously pardon the said offence: nevertheless, He is resolved from henceforth that on no pretence whatsoever any pardon shall be hereafter granted to any person whatsoever for killing of any man, in any duel or rencounter, but that the course of law shall wholly take place in all such cases.” The warrant for a pardon to George, Duke of Buckingham, is dated