[Pett was made a scapegoat. This is confirmed by Marvel:
“After
this loss, to relish discontent,
Some
one must be accused by Parliament;
All
our miscarriages on Pett must fall,
His
name alone seems fit to answer all.
Whose
counsel first did this mad war beget?
Who
all commands sold through the Navy? Pett.
Who
would not follow when the Dutch were beat?
Who
treated out the time at Bergen? Pett.
Who
the Dutch fleet with storms disabled met,
And,
rifling prizes, them neglected? Pett.
Who
with false news prevented the Gazette,
The
fleet divided, writ for Ruhert? Pett.
Who
all our seamen cheated of their debt?
And
all our prizes who did swallow? Pett.
Who
did advise no navy out to set?
And
who the forts left unprepared? Pett.
Who
to supply with powder did forget
Languard,
Sheerness, Gravesend, and Upnor? Pett.
Who
all our ships exposed in Chatham net?
Who
should it be but the fanatick Pett?
Pett,
the sea-architect, in making ships,
Was
the first cause of all these naval slips.
Had
he not built, none of these faults had been;
If
no creation, there had been no sin
But
his great crime, one boat away he sent,
That
lost our fleet, and did our flight prevent.”
Instructions to a Painter.—B]
The latter urged, that there must be some faults, and that the Admiral must be found to have done his part. I did say an unhappy word, which I was sorry for, when he complained of want of oares for the boats: and there was, it seems, enough, and good enough, to carry away all the boats with from the King’s occasions. He said he used never a boat till they were all gone but one; and that was to carry away things of great value, and these were his models of ships; which, when the Council, some of them, had said they wished that the Dutch had had them instead of the King’s ships, he answered,