That she was somewhat “blocky” above water was doubtless true of her, as of most of her class; but that she was not unshapely below the water-line is quite certain, for the re markable return passage she made to England (in ballast) shows that her lower lines must have been good.  She made the run from Plymouth to London on her return voyage in just thirty-one days, a passage that even with the “clipper ships” of later days would have been respectable, and for a vessel of her model and rig was exceptionally good.  She was “light” (in ballast), as we know from the correspondence of Weston and Bradford, the letter of the former to Governor Carver—­who died before it was received—­upbraiding him for sending her home “empty.”  The terrible sickness and mortality of the whole company, afloat and ashore, had, of course, made it impossible to freight her as intended with “clapboards” [stave-stock], sassafras roots, peltry, etc.  No vessels of her class of that day were without the high poop and its cabin possibilities,—­admirably adapting them to passenger service,—­and the larger had the high and roomy topgallant forecastles so necessary for their larger crews.  The breadth of beam was always considerably greater in that day than earlier, or until much later, necessitated by the proportionately greater height ("topsides"), above water, at stem and stern.  The encroachments of her high poop and forecastle left but short waist-room; her waist-ribs limited the height of her “between decks;” while the “perked up” lines of her bow and stern produced the resemblance noted, to the croup and neck of the wild duck.  That she was low “between decks” is demonstrated by the fact that it was necessary to “cut down” the Pilgrims’ shallop—­an open sloop, of certainly not over 30 feet in length, some 10 tons burden, and not very high “freeboard”—­“to stow” her under the may-FLOWER’S spar deck.  That she was “square-rigged” follows, as noted, from the fact that it was the only rig in use for ships of her class and size, and that she had “topsails” is shown by the fact that the “top-saile halliards” were pitched over board with John Howland, and saved his life.  Bradford says:  “A lustie yonge man (called John Howland) coming upon some occasion above ye grattings, was with a seele of ye shipe throwne into ye sea:  but it pleased God yt he caught hould of ye top-saile halliards which hunge over board & rane out at length yet he held his hould . . . till he was haled up,” etc.  Howland had evidently just come from below upon the poop-deck (as there would be no “grattings” open in the waist to receive the heavy seas shipped).  The ship was clearly experiencing “heavy weather” and a great lurch ("seele”) which at the stern, and on the high, swinging, tilting poop-deck would be most severely felt, undoubtedly tossed him over the rail.  The topsail halliards were probably trailing alongside and saved him, as they have others under like circumstances.