The Mayflower and Her Log; July 15, 1620-May 6, 1621 — Complete eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 484 pages of information about The Mayflower and Her Log; July 15, 1620-May 6, 1621 — Complete.

The Mayflower and Her Log; July 15, 1620-May 6, 1621 — Complete eBook

This eBook from the Gutenberg Project consists of approximately 484 pages of information about The Mayflower and Her Log; July 15, 1620-May 6, 1621 — Complete.
seeing so many crosses befallen and the year time so far spent.  But others, in regard of their own weakness and the charge of many young children, were thought [by the Managers] least useful and most unfit to bear the brunt of this hard adventure.”  It is evident from the above that, while the return of most was from choice, some were sent back by those in authority, as unfit for the undertaking, and that of these some had “many young chil dren.”  There are said to have been eighteen who returned on the Speedwell to London.  We know who six of them were, leaving twelve, or two thirds, unknown.  Whether these twelve were in part from Leyden, and were part English, we shall probably never know.  If any of them were from Holland, then the number of those who left Delfshaven on the Speedwell is increased by so many.  If any were of the English contingent, and probably the most were,—­then the passenger list of the may-Flower from London to Southampton was probably, by so many, the larger.  It is evident, from Bradford’s remark, that, among the twelve unknown, were some who, from “their own weakness and charge of many young children, were thought least useful and most unfit,” etc.  From this it is clear that at least one family was included which had a number of young children, the parents’ “own weakness” being recognized.  A father, mother, and four children (in view of the term “many”) would seem a reasonable surmise, and would make six, or another third of the whole number.  The probability that the unknown two thirds were chiefly from England, rather than Holland, is increased by observation of the evident care with which, as a rule, those from the Leyden congregation were picked, as to strength and fitness, and also by the fact that their Leyden homes were broken up.  Winslow remarks, “the youngest and strongest part were to go,” and an analysis of the list shows that those selected were mostly such.  Bradford, in stating that Martin was “from Billericay in Essex,” says, “from which part came sundry others.”  It is quite possible that some of the unknown twelve who returned were from this locality, as none of those who went on the may-Flower are understood to have hailed from there, beside the Martins.

All the colonists still intending to go to America were now gathered in one vessel.  Whatever previous disposition of them had been made, or whatever relations they might have had in the disjointed record of the exodus, were ephemeral, and are now lost sight of in the enduring interest which attaches to their final and successful “going forth” as may-Flower Pilgrims.

Copyrights
Project Gutenberg
The Mayflower and Her Log; July 15, 1620-May 6, 1621 — Complete from Project Gutenberg. Public domain.