You study them with all that you know of their origin
and their heredity, and little by little beneath the
varnish of cosmopolitanism you discover their race,
irresistible, indestructible race! In the mistress
of the house, very elegant, very cultured, for example,
a Madame Steno, you discover the descendant of the
Doges, the patrician of the fifteenth century, with
the form of a queen, strength in her passion and frankness
in her incomparable immorality; while in a Florent
Chapron or a Lydia you discover the primitive slave,
the black hypnotized by the white, the unfreed being
produced by centuries of servitude; while in a Madame
Gorka you recognize beneath her smiling amiability
the fanaticism of truth of the Puritans; beneath the
artistic refinement of a Lincoln Maitland you find
the squatter, invincibly coarse and robust; in Boleslas
Gorka all the nervous irritability of the Slav, which
has ruined Poland. These lineaments of race are
hardly visible in the civilized person, who speaks
three or four languages fluently, who has lived in
Paris, Nice, Florence, here, that same fashionable,
monotonous life. But when passion strikes its
blow, when the man is stirred to his inmost depths,
then occurs the conflict of characteristics, more
surprising when the people thus brought together have
come from afar: And that is why,” he concluded
with a laugh, “I have spent six months in Rome
without hardly having seen a Roman, busy, observing
the little clan which is so revolting to you.
It is probably the twentieth I have studied, and I
shall no doubt study twenty more, for not one resembles
another. Are you indulgently inclined toward me,
now that you have got even with me in making me hold
forth at this corner, like the hero of a Russian novel?
Well, now adieu.”
Montfanon had listened to the discourse with an inpenetrable
air. In the religious solitude in which he was
awaiting the end, as he said, nothing afforded him
greater pleasure than the discussion of ideas.
But he was inspired by the enthusiasm of a man who
feels with extreme ardor, and when he was met by the
partly ironical dilettanteism of Dorsenne he was almost
pained by it, so much the more so as the author and
he had some common theories, notably an extreme fancy
for heredity and race. A sort of discontented
grimace distorted his expressive face. He clicked
his tongue in ill-humor, and said:
“One more question!.... And the result
of all that, the object? To what end does all
this observation lead you?”
“To what should it lead me? To comprehend,
as I have told you,” replied Dorsenne.
“And then?”
“There is no then,” answered the young
man, “one debauchery is like another.”
“But among the people whom you see living thus,”
said Montfanon, after a pause, “there are some
surely whom you like and whom you dislike, for whom
you entertain esteem and for whom you feel contempt?
Have you not thought that you have some duties toward
them, that you can aid them in leading better lives?”