before they were published. My negligence and
the confidence I had in M. Mathas, in whose garden
I was shut up, frequently made me forget to lock the
door at night, and in the morning I several times
found it wide open; this, however, would not have given
me the least inquietude had I not thought my papers
seemed to have been deranged. After having several
times made the same remark, I became more careful,
and locked the door. The lock was a bad one,
and the key turned in it no more than half round.
As I became more attentive, I found my papers in
a much greater confusion than they were when I left
everything open. At length I missed one of my
volumes without knowing what was become of it until
the morning of the third day, when I again found it
upon the table. I never suspected either M. Mathas
or his nephew M. du Moulin, knowing myself to be beloved
by both, and my confidence in them was unbounded.
That I had in the gossips began to diminish.
Although they were Jansenists, I knew them to have
some connection with D’ Alembert, and moreover
they all three lodged in the same house. This
gave me some uneasiness, and put me more upon my guard.
I removed my papers from the alcove to my chamber,
and dropped my acquaintance with these people, having
learned they had shown in several houses the first
volume of ‘Emilius’, which I had been imprudent
enough to lend them. Although they continued
until my departure to be my neighbors I never, after
my first suspicions, had the least communication with
them. The ‘Social Contract’ appeared
a month or two before ‘Emilius’.
Rey, whom I had desired never secretly to introduce
into France any of my books, applied to the magistrate
for leave to send this book by Rouen, to which place
he sent his package by sea. He received no answer,
and his bales, after remaining at Rouen several months,
were returned to him, but not until an attempt had
been made to confiscate them; this, probably, would
have been done had not he made a great clamor.
Several persons, whose curiosity the work had excited,
sent to Amsterdam for copies, which were circulated
without being much noticed. Maulion, who had
heard of this, and had, I believe, seen the work,
spoke to me on the subject with an air of mystery
which surprised me, and would likewise have made me
uneasy if, certain of having conformed to every rule,
I had not by virtue of my grand maxim, kept my mind
calm. I moreover had no doubt but M. de Choiseul,
already well disposed towards me, and sensible of the
eulogium of his administration, which my esteem for
him had induced me to make in the work, would support
me against the malevolence of Madam de Pompadour.