notwithstanding the wheedling of Father Berthier,
that the Jesuits did not like me, not only as an Encyclopedist,
but because all my principles were more in opposition
to their maxims and influence than the incredulity
of my colleagues, since atheistical and devout fanaticism,
approaching each other by their common enmity to toleration,
may become united; a proof of which is seen in China,
and in the cabal against myself; whereas religion,
both reasonable and moral, taking away all power over
the conscience, deprives those who assume that power
of every resource. I knew the chancellor was
a great friend to the Jesuits, and I had my fears
less the son, intimidated by the father, should find
himself under the necessity of abandoning the work
he had protected. I besides imagined that I
perceived this to be the case in the chicanery employed
against me relative to the first two volumes, in which
alterations were required for reasons of which I could
not feel the force; whilst the other two volumes were
known to contain things of such a nature as, had the
censor objected to them in the manner he did to the
passages he thought exceptionable in the others, would
have required their being entirely written over again.
I also understood, and M. de Malesherbes himself
told me of it, that the Abbe de Grave, whom he had
charged with the inspection of this edition, was another
partisan of the Jesuits. I saw nothing but Jesuits,
without considering that, upon the point of being
suppressed, and wholly taken up in making their defence,
they had something which interested them much more
than the cavillings relative to a work in which they
were not in question. I am wrong, however, in
saying this did not occur to me; for I really thought
of it, and M. de Malesherbes took care to make the
observation to me the moment he heard of my extravagant
suspicions. But by another of those absurdities
of a man, who, from the bosom of obscurity, will absolutely
judge of the secret of great affairs, with which he
is totally unacquainted. I never could bring
myself to believe the Jesuits were in danger, and
I considered the rumor of their suppression as an artful
manoeuvre of their own to deceive their adversaries.
Their past successes, which had been uninterrupted,
gave me so terrible an idea of the power, that I already
was grieved at the overthrow of the parliament.
I knew M. de Choiseul had prosecuted his studies under
the Jesuits, that Madam de Pompadour was not upon
bad terms with them, and that their league with favorites
and ministers had constantly appeared advantageous
to their order against their common enemies.
The court seemed to remain neuter, and persuaded as
I was that should the society receive a severe check
it would not come from the parliament, I saw in the
inaction of government the ground of their confidence
and the omen of their triumph.