Talleyrand well knew the precarious state of Schimmelpenninck’s grandeur; that it not only depended upon the whim of Napoleon, but had long been intended as an hereditary sovereignty for Jerome.  Another Dutchman asked him not to ruin his friend and his family for what he was well aware could never be called a sinecure place, and was so precarious in its tenure.  “Foolish vanity,” answered the Minister, “can never pay enough for the gratification of its desires.  All the Schimmelpennincks in the world do not possess property enough to recompense me for the sovereign honours which I have procured for one of their name and family, were he deposed within twenty-four hours.  What treasures can indemnify me for connecting such a name and such a personage with the great name of the First Emperor of the French?”

I have only twice in my life been in Schimmelpenninck’s company, and I thought him both timid and reserved; but from what little he said, I could not possibly judge of his character and capacity.  His portrait and its accompaniments have been presented to me; such as delivered to you by one of his countrymen, a Mr. M——­ (formerly an Ambassador also), who was both his schoolfellow and his comrade at the university.  I shall add the following traits, in his own words as near as possible: 

“More vain than ambitious, Schimmelpenninck from his youth, and, particularly, from his entrance into public life, tried every means to make a noise, but found none to make a reputation.  He caressed in succession all the systems of the French Revolution, without adopting one for himself.  All the Kings of faction received in their turns his homage and felicitations.  It was impossible to mention to him a man of any notoriety, of whom he did not become immediately a partisan.  The virtues or the vices, the merit or defects, of the individual were of no consideration; according to his judgment it was sufficient to be famous.  Yet with all the extravagances of a head filled with paradoxes, and of a heart spoiled by modern philosophy, added to a habit of licentiousness, he had no idea of becoming an instrument for the destruction of liberty in his own country, much less of becoming its tyrant, in submitting to be the slave of France.  It was but lately that he took the fancy, after so long admiring all other great men of our age, to be at any rate one of their number, and of being admired as a great man in his turn.  On this account many accuse him of hypocrisy, but no one deserves that appellation less, his vanity and exaltation never permitting him to dissimulate; and no presumption, therefore, was less disguised than his, to those who studied the man.  Without acquired ability, without natural genius, or political capacity, destitute of discretion and address, as confident and obstinate as ignorant, he is only elevated to fall and to rise no more.”