his most ordinary commonplace actions. With much
ease when nothing constrained him, he was gentle,
affable, open, of facile and charming access; the
tone of his voice was agreeable, and he had a surprisingly
easy flow of words upon all subjects which nothing
ever disturbed, and which never failed to surprise;
his eloquence was natural and extended even to his
most familiar discourse, while it equally entered into
his observations upon the most abstract sciences,
on which he talked most perspicuously; the affairs
of government, politics, finance, justice, war, the
court, ordinary conversation, the arts, and mechanics.
He could speak as well too upon history and memoirs,
and was well acquainted with pedigrees. The
personages of former days were familiar to him; and
the intrigues of the ancient courts were to him as
those of his own time. To hear him, you would
have thought him a great reader. Not so.
He skimmed; but his memory was so singular that he
never forgot things, names, or dates, cherishing remembrance
of things with precision; and his apprehension was
so good, that in skimming thus it was, with him, precisely
as though he had read very laboriously. He excelled
in unpremeditated discourse, which, whether in the
shape of repartee or jest, was always appropriate
and vivacious. He often reproached me, and others
more than he, with “not spoiling him;”
but I often gave him praise merited by few, and which
belonged to nobody so justly as to him; it was, that
besides having infinite ability and of various kinds,
the singular perspicuity of his mind was joined to
so much exactness, that he would never have made a
mistake in anything if he had allowed the first suggestions
of his judgment. He oftentimes took this my eulogy
as a reproach, and he was not always wrong, but it
was not the less true. With all this he had no
presumption, no trace of superiority natural or acquired;
he reasoned with you as with his equal, and struck
the most able with surprise. Although he never
forgot his own position, nor allowed others to forget
it, he carried no constraint with him, but put everybody
at his ease, and placed himself upon the level of all
others.
He had the weakness to believe that he resembled Henry
IV. in everything, and strove to affect the manners,
the gestures, the bearing, of that monarch.
Like Henry IV. he was naturally good, humane, compassionate;
and, indeed, this man, who has been so cruelly accused
of the blackest and most inhuman crimes, was more
opposed to the destruction of others than any one
I have ever known, and had such a singular dislike
to causing anybody pain that it may be said, his gentleness,
his humanity, his easiness, had become faults; and
I do not hesitate to affirm that that supreme virtue
which teaches us to pardon our enemies he turned into
vice, by the indiscriminate prodigality with which
he applied it; thereby causing himself many sad embarrassments
and misfortunes, examples and proofs of which will
be seen in the sequel.