My brother was a great admirer of the Ingoldsby Legends, and could himself handle Richard Barham’s fascinating metre very effectively. He was meditating “A Pseudo-Ingoldsbean Lay,” dealing with leading personalities in the then House of Commons. The idea came to nothing, as an “Ingoldsby Legend” must, from its very essence, be cast in a narrative form, and the subject did not lend itself to narrative. Although it has nothing to do with the subject in hand, I must quote some lines from “The Raid of Carlisle,” another “Pseudo-Ingoldsbean Lay” of my brother’s, to show how easily he could use Barham’s metre, with its ear-tickling double rhyme, and how thoroughly he had assimilated the spirit of the Ingoldsby Legends. The extracts are from an account of an incident which occurred in 1596 when Lord Scroop was Warden of the Western or English Marches on behalf of Elizabeth, while Buccleuch, on the Scottish side, was Warden of the Middle Marches on behalf of James VI.
“Now, I’d better
explain, while I’m still in the vein,
That towards the close of
Elizabeth’s reign,
Though the ‘thistle
and rose’ were no longer at blows,
They’d a way of disturbing
each other’s repose.
A mode of proceeding most
clearly exceeding
The rules of decorum, and
palpably needing
Some clear understanding between
the two nations,
By which to adjust their unhappy
relations.
With this object in view,
it occurred to Buccleuch
That a great deal of mutual
good would accrue
If they settled that he and
Lord Scroop’s nominee
Should meet once a year, and
between them agree
To arbitrate all controversial
cases
And grant an award on an equable
basis.
A brilliant idea that promised
to be a
Corrective, if not a complete
panacea—
For it really appears that
for several years,
These fines of ‘poll’d
Angus’ and Galloway steers
Did greatly conduce, during
seasons of truce,
To abating traditional forms
of abuse,
And to giving the roues of
Border society
Some little sense of domestic
propriety.
So finding himself, so to
speak, up a tree,
And unable to think of a neat
repartee,
He wisely concluded (as Brian
Boru did,
On seeing his ‘illigant
counthry’ denuded
Of cattle and grain that were
swept from the plain
By the barbarous hand of the
pillaging Dane)
To bandy no words with a dominant
foe,
But to wait for a chance of
returning the blow,
And then let him have it in
more suo.”
These extracts make me regret that the leading personalities in the Parliament of 1886 were not commemorated in the same pleasant, jingling metre.