moral side of the proposition as little as possible.  Do not claim that holding up trains is the only business a gentleman would engage in, and, on the contrary, do not depreciate a profession that is really only financiering with spurs on.  Describe the FACTS and DETAILS—­all that part of the proceedings that the passenger sitting with his hands up in a Pullman looking into the end of a tunnel in the hands of one of the performers does not see.  Here is a rough draft of my idea:  Begin abruptly, without any philosophizing, with your idea of the best times, places and conditions for the hold-up—­compare your opinions of this with those of others—­mention some poorly conceived attempts and failures of others, giving your opinion why—­as far as possible refer to actual occurrences, and incidents—­describe the manner of a hold-up, how many men is best, where they are stationed, how do they generally go into it, nervous? or joking? or solemnly.  The details of stopping the train, the duties of each man of the gang—­the behavior of the train crew and passengers (here give as many brief odd and humorous incidents as you can think of).  Your opinions on going through the passengers, when is it done and when not done.  How is the boodle gotten at?  How does the express clerk generally take it?  Anything done with the mail car?  UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES WILL A TRAIN ROBBER SHOOT A PASSENGER OR A TRAIN MAN—­suppose a man refuses to throw up his hands?  Queer articles found on passengers (a chance here for some imaginative work)—­queer and laughable incidents of any kind.  Refer whenever apropos to actual hold-ups and facts concerning them of interest.  What could two or three brave and determined passengers do if they were to try?  Why don’t they try?  How long does it take to do the business.  Does the train man ever stand in with the hold-up?  Best means of getting away—­how and when is the money divided.  How is it mostly spent.  Best way to manoeuvre afterward.  How to get caught and how not to.  Comment on the methods of officials who try to capture. (Here’s your chance to get even.)

These ideas are some that occur to me casually.  You will, of course, have many far better.  I suggest that you make the article anywhere from 4,000 to 6,000 words.  Get as much meat in it as you can, and, by the way—­stuff it full of western, GENUINE slang—­(not the eastern story paper kind).  Get all the quaint cowboy expressions and terms of speech you can think of.

INFORMATION is what we want, clothed in the peculiar western style of the character we want to present.  The main idea is to be NATURAL, DIRECT, AND CONCISE.

I hope you will understand what I say.  I don’t.  But try her a whack and send it along as soon as you can, and let’s see what we can do.  By the way, Mr.  “Everybody” pays good prices.  I thought I would, when I get your story, put it into the shape my judgment decides upon, and then send both your MS. and mine to the magazine.  If he uses mine, we’ll whack up shares on the proceeds.  If he uses yours, you get the check direct.  If he uses neither, we are out only a few stamps.