I cannot engage myself so deep and so entire; when my will gives me to anything, ’tis not with so violent an obligation that my judgment is infected with it.  In the present broils of this kingdom, my own interest has not made me blind to the laudable qualities of our adversaries, nor to those that are reproachable in those men of our party.  Others adore all of their own side; for my part, I do not so much as excuse most things in those of mine:  a good work has never the worst grace with me for being made against me.  The knot of the controversy excepted, I have always kept myself in equanimity and pure indifference: 

     “Neque extra necessitates belli praecipuum odium gero;”

     ["Nor bear particular hatred beyond the necessities of war.”]

for which I am pleased with myself; and the more because I see others commonly fail in the contrary direction.  Such as extend their anger and hatred beyond the dispute in question, as most men do, show that they spring from some other occasion and private cause; like one who, being cured of an ulcer, has yet a fever remaining, by which it appears that the ulcer had another more concealed beginning.  The reason is that they are not concerned in the common cause, because it is wounding to the state and general interest; but are only nettled by reason of their particular concern.  This is why they are so especially animated, and to a degree so far beyond justice and public reason: 

          “Non tam omnia universi, quam ea, quae ad quemque pertinent,
          singuli carpebant.”

     ["Every one was not so much angry against things in general, as
     against those that particularly concern himself.” 
     —­Livy, xxxiv. 36.]

I would have the advantage on our side; but if it be not, I shall not run mad.  I am heartily for the right party; but I do not want to be taken notice of as an especial enemy to others, and beyond the general quarrel.  I marvellously challenge this vicious form of opinion:  “He is of the League because he admires the graciousness of Monsieur de Guise; he is astonished at the King of Navarre’s energy, therefore he is a Huguenot; he finds this to say of the manners of the king, he is therefore seditious in his heart.”  And I did not grant to the magistrate himself that he did well in condemning a book because it had placed a heretic —­[Theodore de Beza.]—­amongst the best poets of the time.  Shall we not dare to say of a thief that he has a handsome leg?  If a woman be a strumpet, must it needs follow that she has a foul smell?  Did they in the wisest ages revoke the proud title of Capitolinus they had before conferred on Marcus Manlius as conservator of religion and the public liberty, and stifle the memory of his liberality, his feats of arms, and military recompenses granted to his valour, because he, afterwards aspired to the sovereignty, to the prejudice of the laws of his country?