pleasure and riches as set all the philosophers against him:  but as to his manners, Dionysius the tyrant, having presented three beautiful women before him, to take his choice; he made answer, that he would choose them all, and that Paris got himself into trouble for having preferred one before the other two:  but, having taken them home to his house, he sent them back untouched.  His servant finding himself overladen upon the way, with the money he carried after him, he ordered him to pour out and throw away that which troubled him.  And Epicurus, whose doctrines were so irreligious and effeminate, was in his life very laborious and devout; he wrote to a friend of his that he lived only upon biscuit and water, entreating him to send him a little cheese, to lie by him against he had a mind to make a feast.  Must it be true, that to be a perfect good man, we must be so by an occult, natural, and universal propriety, without law, reason, or example?  The debauches wherein I have been engaged, have not been, I thank God, of the worst sort, and I have condemned them in myself, for my judgment was never infected by them; on the contrary, I accuse them more severely in myself than in any other; but that is all, for, as to the rest.  I oppose too little resistance and suffer myself to incline too much to the other side of the balance, excepting that I moderate them, and prevent them from mixing with other vices, which for the most part will cling together, if a man have not a care.  I have contracted and curtailed mine, to make them as single and as simple as I can: 

                              “Nec ultra
                    Errorem foveo.”

               ["Nor do I cherish error further.”
               or:  “Nor carry wrong further.” 
               —­Juvenal, viii. 164.]

For as to the opinion of the Stoics, who say, “That the wise man when he works, works by all the virtues together, though one be most apparent, according to the nature of the action”; and herein the similitude of a human body might serve them somewhat, for the action of anger cannot work, unless all the humours assist it, though choler predominate; —­if they will thence draw a like consequence, that when the wicked man does wickedly, he does it by all the vices together, I do not believe it to be so, or else I understand them not, for I by effect find the contrary.  These are sharp, unsubstantial subleties, with which philosophy sometimes amuses itself.  I follow some vices, but I fly others as much as a saint would do.  The Peripatetics also disown this indissoluble connection; and Aristotle is of opinion that a prudent and just man may be intemperate and inconsistent.  Socrates confessed to some who had discovered a certain inclination to vice in his physiognomy, that it was, in truth, his natural propension, but that he had by discipline corrected it.  And such as were familiar with the philosopher Stilpo said, that being born with addiction to wine and women, he had by study rendered himself very abstinent both from the one and the other.