Bonaparte was sensitive, in an extraordinary degree, to all that was said and thought of him, and Heaven knows how many despatches I received from headquarters during the campaign of Vienna directing me not only to watch the vigilant execution of the custom-house laws, but to lay an embargo on a thing which alarmed him more than the introduction of British merchandise, viz. the publication of news.  In conformity with these reiterated instructions I directed especial attention to the management of the ‘Correspondant’.  The importance of this journal, with its 60,000 readers, may easily be perceived.  I procured the insertion of everything I thought desirable:  all the bulletins, proclamations, acts of the French Government, notes of the ‘Moniteur’, and the semi-official articles of the French journals:  these were all given ‘in extenso’.  On the other hand, I often suppressed adverse news, which, though well known, would have received additional weight from its insertion in so widely circulated a paper.  If by chance there crept in some Austrian bulletin, extracted from the other German papers published in the States of the Confederation of the Rhine, there was always given with it a suitable antidote to destroy, or at least to mitigate, its ill effect.  But this was not all.  The King of Wurtemberg having reproached the ‘Correspondant’, in a letter to the Minister for Foreign Affairs, with publishing whatever Austria wished should be made known, and being conducted in a spirit hostile to the good cause, I answered these unjust reproaches by making the Syndic censor prohibit the Hamburg papers from inserting any Austrian order of the day, any Archduke’s bulletins, any letter from Prague; in short, anything which should be copied from the other German journals unless those articles had been inserted in the French journals.

My recollections of the year 1809 at Hamburg carry me back to the celebration of Napoleon’s fete, which was on the 15th of August, for he had interpolated his patron saint in the Imperial calendar at the date of his birth.  The coincidence of this festival with the Assumption gave rise to adulatory rodomontades of the most absurd description.  Certainly the Episcopal circulars under the Empire would form a curious collection.

—­[It will perhaps scarcely be believed that the following words were actually delivered from the pulpit:  “God in his mercy has chosen Napoleon to be his representative on earth.  The Queen of Heaven has marked, by the most magnificent of presents, the anniversary of the day which witnessed his glorious entrance into her domains.  Heavenly Virgin! as a special testimony of your love for the French, and your all-powerful influence with your son, you have connected the first of your solemnities with the birth of the great Napoleon.  Heaven ordained that the hero should spring from your sepulchre.”—­Bourrienne.]—­

Could anything be more revolting than the sycophancy of those Churchmen who declared that “God chose Napoleon for his representative upon earth, and that God created Bonaparte, and then rested; that he was more fortunate than Augustus, more virtuous than Trajan; that he deserved altars and temples to be raised to him!” etc.