In the month of March hereditary succession and a dynasty were in everybody’s mouths.  Lucien was the most violent propagator of these ideas, and he pursued his vocation of apostle with constancy and address.  It has already been mentioned that, by his brother’s confession; he published in 1800 a pamphlet enforcing the same ideas; which work Bonaparte afterwards condemned as a premature development of his projects.  M. de Talleyrand, whose ideas could not be otherwise than favourable to the monarchical form of government, was ready to enter into explanations with the Cabinets of Europe on the subject.  The words which now constantly resounded in every ear were “stability and order,” under cloak of which the downfall of the people’s right was to be concealed.  At the same time Bonaparte, with the view of disparaging the real friends of constitutional liberty, always called them ideologues,

—­[I have classed all these people under the denomination of Ideologues, which, besides, is what specially and literally fits them,—­searchers after ideas (ideas generally empty).  They have been made more ridiculous than even I expected by this application, a correct one, of the term ideologue to them.  The phrase has been successful, I believe, because it was mine (Napoleon in Iung’s Lucien, tome ii. p, 293).  Napoleon welcomed every attack on this description of sage.  Much pleased with a discourse by Royer Collard, he said to Talleyrand, “Do you know, Monsieur is Grand Electeur, that a new and serious philosophy is rising in my university, which may do us great honour and disembarrass us completely of the ideologues, slaying them on the spot by reasoning?” It is with something of the same satisfaction that Renan, writing of 1898, says that the finer dreams had been disastrous when brought into the domain of facts, and that human concerns only began to improve when the ideologues ceased to meddle with them (Souvenirs, p. 122).]—­

or terrorists.  Madame Bonaparte opposed with fortitude the influence of counsels which she believed fatal to her husband.  He indeed spoke rarely, and seldom confidentially, with her on politics or public affairs.  “Mind your distaff or your needle,” was with him a common phrase.  The individuals who applied themselves with most perseverance in support of the hereditary question were Lucien, Roederer, Regnault de St. Jean d’Angely, and Fontanel.  Their efforts were aided by the conclusion of peace with England, which, by re-establishing general tranquillity for a time, afforded the First Consul an opportunity of forwarding any plan.

While the First Consul aspired to the throne of France, his brothers, especially Lucien, affected a ridiculous pride and pretension.  Take an almost incredible example of which I was witness.  On Sunday, the 9th of May, Lucien came to see Madame Bonaparte, who said to him, “Why did you not come to dinner last Monday?”—­“Because there was no place marked for me:  the brothers of Napoleon ought to have the first place after him.”—­ “What am I to understand by that?” answered Madame Bonaparte.  “If you are the brother of Bonaparte, recollect what you were.  At my house all places are the same.  Eugene world never have committed such a folly.”