all will, upon that subject. Plead, as you truly
may, your own ignorance; and say, that it is impossible
to judge of those nice points, at such a distance,
and without knowing all circumstances, which you cannot
be supposed to do. And as to the Duke’s
resignation; you should, in my opinion, say, that
perhaps there might be a little too much vivacity in
the case, but that, upon the whole, you make no doubt
of the thing’s being soon set right again; as,
in truth, I dare say it will. Upon these delicate
occasions, you must practice the ministerial shrugs
and ‘persiflage’; for silent gesticulations,
which you would be most inclined to, would not be
sufficient: something must be said, but that something,
when analyzed, must amount to nothing. As for
instance, ’Il est vrai qu’on s’y
perd, mais que voulez-vous que je vous dise?—il
y a bien du pour et du contre; un petit Resident ne
voit gueres le fond du sac.—Il faut attendre.—Those
sort of expletives are of infinite use; and nine people
in ten think they mean something. But to the Landgrave
of Hesse I think you would do well to say, in seeming
confidence, that you have good reason to believe that
the principal objection of his Majesty to the convention
was that his Highness’s interests, and the affair
of his troops, were not sufficiently considered in
it. To the Prussian Minister assert boldly that
you know ‘de science certaine’, that the
principal object of his Majesty’s and his British
Ministry’s intention is not only to perform
all their present engagements with his Master, but
to take new and stronger ones for his support; for
this is true—
at least at
present.
You did very well in inviting Comte Bothmar to dine
with you. You see how minutely I am informed
of your proceedings, though not from yourself.
Adieu.
I go to Bath next Saturday; but direct your letters,
as usual, to London.
LETTER CCXI
Bath, October 26, 1757.
My dear friend: I arrived here
safe, but far from sound, last Sunday. I have
consequently drunk these waters but three days, and
yet I find myself something better for them.
The night before I left London. I was for some
hours at Newcastle House, where the letters, which
came that morning, lay upon the table: and his
Grace singled out yours with great approbation, and,
at the same time, assured me of his Majesty’s
approbation, too. To these two approbations I
truly add my own, which, ‘sans vanite’,
may perhaps be near as good as the other two.
In that letter you venture ‘vos petits raisonnemens’
very properly, and then as properly make an excuse
for doing so. Go on so, with diligence, and you
will be, what I began to despair of your ever being,
somebody. I am persuaded, if you would own
the truth, that you feel yourself now much better
satisfied with yourself than you were while you did
nothing.