morality, you will find it fully and admirably stated
in ‘Les Lettres d’un Provincial’,
by the famous Monsieur Pascal; and it is a book very
well worth your reading. Few people see what
they see, or hear what they hear; that is, they see
and hear so inattentively and superficially, that they
are very little the better for what they do see and
hear. This, I dare say, neither is, nor will
be your case. You will understand, reflect upon,
and consequently retain, what you see and hear.
You have still two years good, but no more, to form
your character in the world decisively; for, within
two months after your arrival in England, it will be
finally and irrevocably determined, one way or another,
in the opinion of the public. Devote, therefore,
these two years to the pursuit of perfection; which
ought to be everybody’s object, though in some
particulars unattainable; those who strive and labor
the most, will come the nearest to it. But, above
all things, aim at it in the two important arts of
speaking and pleasing; without them all your other
talents are maimed and crippled. They are the
wings upon which you must soar above other people;
without them you will only crawl with the dull mass
of mankind. Prepossess by your air, address,
and manners; persuade by your tongue; and you will
easily execute what your head has contrived. I
desire that you will send me very minute accounts
from Rome, not of what you see, but, of who you see;
of your pleasures and entertainments. Tell me
what companies you frequent most, and how you are
received.
LETTER XCVII
London, December 19, O. S. 1749.
Dear boy: The knowledge of mankind
is a very use ful knowledge for everybody; a most
necessary one for you, who are destined to an active,
public life. You will have to do with all sorts
of characters; you should, therefore, know them thoroughly,
in order to manage them ably. This knowledge
is not to be gotten systematically; you must acquire
it yourself by your own observation and sagacity;
I will give you such hints as I think may be useful
land-marks in your intended progress.
I have often told you (and it is most true) that,
with regard to mankind, we must not draw general conclusions
from certain particular principles, though, in the
main, true ones. We must not suppose that, because
a man is a rational animal, he will therefore always
act rationally; or, because he has such or such a
predominant passion, that he will act invariably and
consequentially in the pursuit of it. No.
We are complicated machines: and though we have
one main-spring, that gives motion to the whole, we
have an infinity of little wheels, which, in their
turns, retard, precipitate, and sometimes stop that
motion. Let us exemplify. I will suppose
ambition to be (as it commonly is) the predominant
passion of a minister of state; and I will suppose
that minister to be an able one. Will he, therefore,